CHINTAN UMEDSINH SODHA,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), JAMNAGAR
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed in above terms
ITA 246/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Dec 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiआयकरअपील सं. /Ita No.246/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2016-17 बनाम Chintan Umedsinh Sodha Income Tax Officer “Het” Chitrkutt Society, / Ward – 1(3), Jamnagar Plot No. 21-22, Vs Opp. Khodiyar Co, Jamnagar- 361 006 Gujrat India "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Avgps4814B (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250
section 250 of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by National Faceless Appeal Centre
(NFAC), Delhi/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’), dated
28.02.2024, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by Assessing
Officer u/s. 143(3) of the Act, on 24.12.2018. Chintan Umedsinh Sodha vs. ITO
2. The Grounds of appeal
