Search: house property

6 results for “house property”+ Section 109clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6 Section 2635 Addition to Income5 Section 574 Section 73(1)3 Disallowance3 Set Off of Losses3 Section 10(38)2 Long Term Capital Gains

SMT. MEENABEN KETANKUMAR MAKIM,JAMNAGAR vs. THE PR, CIT, JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 81/RJT/2019[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot19 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sagar Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT. D.R

Section 10(38)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

house properties. 5. Being aggrieved by the order of the Ld. PCIT, the assessee is in appeal before us. 6. The Ld. AR before us filed a paper book running from pages 1 to 21 and submitted that the AO during the assessment proceedings has verified the necessary details. The Ld. AR in support of his contention drew our attention

SMT. MEENABEN KETANKUMAR MAKIM,JAMNAGAR vs. THE PR, CIT, JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

SMT. MEENABEN KETANKUMAR MAKIM,JAMNAGAR vs. THE PR, CIT, JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(2), RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S DML EXIM PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

M/S. D.M.L. EXIM PVT. LTD.,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(2), RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S D.M.L. EXIM PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

M/S SHRI VENU PIPE INDUSTRIES,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2),, JUNAGADH

SURESH CHAND GUPTA,GANDHIDHAM vs. PR. CIT, RAJKOT-1, RAJKOT