BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi80Jaipur65Chennai40Bangalore33Hyderabad27Mumbai25Agra20Surat18Amritsar14Ahmedabad14Lucknow11Pune11Visakhapatnam10Chandigarh10Patna9Indore9Kolkata8Rajkot4Raipur4Cuttack3Guwahati3Calcutta2Jodhpur2Ranchi1SC1Dehradun1Varanasi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 142(1)3Cash Deposit3Demonetization3Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 69A2Section 143(2)2Section 69C2House Property

SHRI JORUBHA JILUBHA JADEJA,VILLAGE ZANKHAR POST VIDINAR TALUKA LALPUR, DIST JAMNAGAR vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 3/RJT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot06 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C

House Property, Income from other sources and Agricultural Income. For the Assessment Year 2017-18, the assessee filed his Return of Income declaring total income at Rs. 2,48,820/- and agricultural income of Rs. 16,95,356/-. The return was selected for scrutiny assessment for the reason “Large agricultural income shown in the return and large cash deposit during

BABUBHAI KANJIBHAI SAKARIYA LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SMT. UJIBEN KANJIBHAI SAKARIYA,JETPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(2)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

2
ITA 185/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Nov 2025AY 2016-17
Section 147

Property. Further, the assessee has claimed receipt of gift from\nthe assessee i.e. Smt. Ujiben K. Sakariya of Rs. 23 lacs during FY 2015-16.\nTo examine the issue, notices were issued to the assessee ( dead person during\nthe course of re-assessment proceedings. The assessing officeer noticed that\nthe assessee had received interest on enhanced compensation paid for\ncompulsory

BHANU PRATAPBHAI GOHEL,PORBANDAR, GUJARAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), PORBANDAR, GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, is partly allowed, in above terms

ITA 206/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot13 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.206/Rjt/2025 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) Bhanu Pratap Gohel, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Tajawala Super Market, S.V.P. Road, Ward – 2 (3), Porbandar – 360 575 Porbandar – 360 575 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Agdpg6078K (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A

House Property, Business & Other Sources. The assessee`s case was selected through CASS (Limited) Scrutiny for A.Y. 2017-18, hence a notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued to the assessee on 10.08.2018 through ITBA and accordingly duly sent to the assessee on e-filing account of the assessee. Accordingly, a notice

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. VAIBHAV GINNING SPINNING MILL PVT. LTD., RAJKOT

In the result, the Appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 826/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपील सं./ Ita No. 826/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Dcit Vs. Vaibhav Ginning & Spinning Central Circle-2, Rajkot Mill Private Limited “Amruta Estate”, 2Nd Floor, Mg Road, National Highway – 27, Gondal Rajkot-360001 Rajkot Highway At Bhojpara, Gondal, Gujarat - 360311 Pan/Gir No.: Aadcv4397D (Assessee) (Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Rajendra Singhal, Ar राज" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10/04/2026

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Singhal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A

property as a Karta of HUF - He had deposited cash of Rs. 63.63 lakhs in his bank account during demonetization - Assessee explained that he was in habit of withdrawing money and keeping in form of cash at home and amount was deposited out of withdrawals from same account from time to time made during years 2014, 2015 and 2016, because