BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 928clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai296Delhi178Bangalore78Ahmedabad75Kolkata62Chennai46Hyderabad37Chandigarh20Jaipur19Pune15Cuttack9Indore8Cochin7Surat7Jodhpur6Visakhapatnam5Guwahati5Panaji4Karnataka3Amritsar3Rajkot3Lucknow2Ranchi2Nagpur2Patna1Punjab & Haryana1Telangana1Raipur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 80I8Section 271(1)(c)7Section 807Disallowance3Addition to Income2Deduction2

THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (4),, RAJKOT vs. PATEL HIGHWAY MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 383/RJT/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 383/Rjt/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2013-2014 Patel Highway Management Pvt. Ltd., I.T.O., 2Nd Floor, Patcon House, Vs. Ward-2(1)4, Kalwad Road, Rajkot. Kotecha Chowk, Rajkot.

For Appellant: Shri Hardik Vora, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT. D.R
Section 80

disallowance made by the ''Ld.AO'' denying deduction u/s.80IA(4) of the Act at Rs.7,73,77,928/- 11. We observe that NHAI awarded the contract to operate maintain and transfer (OMT) for 118 kms of Palanpur to Radhanpur section

M/S. ANUKUL CONSTRUCTION CO.,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(5),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 44/RJT/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot14 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2009-10

For Appellant: Written SubmissionFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, DR
Section 271(1)(c)

928/-. The CIT(A) also sustained the disallowance to the extent of Rs.1,08,880/- in respect of no charge interest on loan and advances given to its partners. The Assessing Officer subsequently initiated penalty proceedings under section

THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (4),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. PATEL HIGHWAY MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 203/RJT/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Feb 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 203/Rjt/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ito Patel Highway Ward-2(1)(4), Rajkot Vs Management Pvt. Ltd., 2Nd Floor, Patcon House, Kalawad Road, Kotecha Chowk, Rajkot Pan No. Aaf Cp1 839 G अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Revenue By : Shri Ranjit Singh, Cit Dr Assessee By : Shri M. J. Ranpura, Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28/02/2020

For Appellant: Shri M. J. Ranpura, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ranjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 80I

disallowance to the tune of Rs. 7.74 crores has been deleted. In fact, the Ld. CIT(A) allowed the appeal preferred by the assessee relying upon the order dated 26.02.2016 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) for A.Y. 2011-12. It was further submitted that the Hon’ble Tribunal by and under its order dated 02.08.2017 upheld such order passed