ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

In the result, summarised and concise ground No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 247 To 250 & 260/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2017-18 2018-19 & 2010-11 Bhawani Industries India Llp Assistant Commissioner Of बनाम/ Income-Tax, Cicle-2(1), Rajkot, C/1-B, 236/3 Gidc, Aji Industrial Room No.311, 3Rd Floor, Aaykar Estate, Rajkot-36 003 Vs. Bhawan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacfb 8046 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.254 To 256/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Bhawani Industries India Llp Assistant Commissioner Of Income- C/1-B, 236/3 Gidc, Aji बनाम/ Tax, Cicle-2(1), Rajkot, Room No.311, Industrial Estate, Rajkot-36 3Rd Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Race Vs. 003 Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacfb 8046 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit-Dr & Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr

80G or section 80GGA or section 80HH or section 80HHA or section 80HHB or section 80HHC or section 80HHD or section 801 or section 801A or section 80J or section 80JJ are allowable in case of the partner also. Which prior to 01.04.1993 were not allowable. Further two new sections has been inserted into the Act. i.e. section

BHAVANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP,RAJKOT vs. ADDI. CIT, RANGE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

80G or section\n80GGA or section 80HH or section 80HHA or section 80HHB or section 80HHC or section\n80HHD or section 801 or section 801A or section 80J or section 80JJ are allowable in case\nof the partner also. Which prior to 01.04.1993 were not allowable.\nFurther two new sections has been inserted into the Act. i.e. section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

80G or section\n80GGA or section 80HH or section 80HHA or section 80HHB or section 80HHC or section\n80HHD or section 801 or section 801A or section 80J or section 80JJ are allowable in case\nof the partner also. Which prior to 01.04.1993 were not allowable.\nFurther two new sections has been inserted into the Act. i.e. section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

In the result, summarised and concise ground No

80G or section\n80GGA or section 80HH or section 80HHA or section 80HHB or section 80HHC or section\n80HHD or section 801 or section 801A or section 80J or section 80JJ are allowable in case\nof the partner also. Which prior to 01.04.1993 were not allowable.\nFurther two new sections has been inserted into the Act. i.e. section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

80G or section\n80GGA or section 80HH or section 80HHA or section 80HHB or section 80HHC or section\n80HHD or section 801 or section 801A or section 80J or section 80JJ are allowable in case\nof the partner also. Which prior to 01.04.1993 were not allowable.\nFurther two new sections has been inserted into the Act. i.e. section

ASSISTANT COMMISSINER OF IINCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

80G or section\n80GGA or section 80HH or section 80HHA or section 80HHB or section 80HHC or section\n80HHD or section 801 or section 801A or section 80J or section 80JJ are allowable in case\nof the partner also. Which prior to 01.04.1993 were not allowable.\nFurther two new sections has been inserted into the Act. i.e. section

BHAVANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

80G or section\n80GGA or section 80HH or section 80HHA or section 80HHB or section 80HHC or section\n80HHD or section 801 or section 801A or section 80J or section 80JJ are allowable in case\nof the partner also. Which prior to 01.04.1993 were not allowable.\nFurther two new sections has been inserted into the Act. i.e. section

SHRI CHAMPABERAJA MITRA MANDAL,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - EXEMPTION, WARD 2, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

disallowing the Form 10AB Filed by passing the rejection order u/s 80G(5)(iii) dated 19.12.2024, on the grounds that "One of the Object Clause as mentioned in the Trust Deed is Religious in Nature". Such conclusion raised is completely baseless as there is no such object of the Trust as per the Deed submitted as executed dated 19.09.2022 which

CHINTAN DWARKADAS CHOTAI,JUNAGADH vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR 1(1), RKT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee, is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

80G of the Act, which were then re- routed back to the donors in cash/RTGS/NEFT or other banking channels. Page 2 of 6 Chintant Dwarkadas Chotai Discreet enquiries revealed that few political parties and charitable organizations were engaged in this huge tax evasion racket and were formed for the sole purpose of aiding and abetting tax evasion and earning commission

THE ITO, WARD-4,, MORBI vs. M/S RAIYANI COTTON INDUSTRIES,, MORBI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A No. 129/Rjt/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to “the Act”) for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2011-12 with the following grounds:- “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made by the AO of Rs. 3,812/- on account of personal

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

section 10(23C) (iiiab) and 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. The appellant has, however, claimed exemption u/s.11 of the Act where the appellant filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 148 of the Act. Therefore, the claim of the appellant that it was not liable to file return is incorrect. The Assessing Officer stated that during

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

section 10(23C) (iiiab) and 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. The appellant has, however, claimed exemption u/s.11 of the Act where the appellant filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 148 of the Act. Therefore, the claim of the appellant that it was not liable to file return is incorrect. The Assessing Officer stated that during

GOPAL SNACKS PVT LTD ,RAJKOT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT

80G, which are claimed as deduction while filing\nreturn of income. The Copies of receipt for donations made have been\nsubmitted by the assessee. The Company has also claimed deductions u/s\n80JJAA of Act. The total no. of employees during the previous year was 2531\nout of which eligible employees for the purpose of section 80JJAA was 627.\nThe copy

GOPAL SNACKS PVT LTD ,RAJKOT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /.Ita Nos. 498 & 499/Rjt/2025 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2020-21 बनाम Gopal Snacks Pvt. Ltd. Asst. Commissioner Of Plot No.2322-2324, Gidc Metoda, Income Tax Vs. Lodhika, Rajkot, Gujarat-360021 Circle-1(1), Rajkot Pan : Aadcg6113A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala & Shri K. K. Maloo, Ars. राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Cit.Dr & Shri Abhimanyu Singh, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 19/11/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08/12/2025

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), dated 18.06.2025 & 17.06.2025, which in turn arise out of separate orders passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 r.w.s. ITA Nos. 498 & 499/Rjt/2025 Gopal Snacks Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 2 144B

SHREE MALIYA KADVA PATEL SEVA SAMAJ,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),, VERAVAL

Appeal of the assessee is dismissed in above terms

disallowed and total income is computed at Rs. 15,51,780/-. Propositions against the addition in appeal may be stated in nutshell as under: I. TRUST IS NOT CREATED OR ESTBALISHED ONLY FOR KADVA PATIDARS BUT FOR ALL PEOPLE OF SOCIETY ALSO: 1. The appellant-trust submitted before lower authorities and reiterates that it is not created or established