Search: disallowance

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai96 Delhi31 Kolkata13 Bangalore11 Ahmedabad9 Surat7 Pune7 Raipur6 Chandigarh4 Jaipur3 Lucknow3 Rajkot3 Chennai3 Hyderabad2 Indore1 SC1 Nagpur1 Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 271A6 Section 143(3)4 Section 1322 Deduction2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2

SHRI TULSHIBHAI POLABHAI SAKARIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 93/RJT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot15 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 93/Rjt/2021 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year:2015-16 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" Shri Tulsibhai Polabhai Sakariya Vs. The Pr. C.I.T, 2-Bombay Housing Society, Rajkot-1, Meghdhara, University Road, Rajkot. Opp. G. K. Dholakiya, Rajkot

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT DR

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54F

disallowed. Thus, the ld. Pr. CIT issued notice under section 263 of the Act dated 27th October 2020 purposing to revise the assessment order being erroneous insofar prejudicial to interest of the Revenue. The assessee vide letter dated 1st December 2020 submitted that he 6. claimed the cost of acquisition at Rs. 740 per Sq. Mts. based on valuation report

SHRI TULSHIBHAI POLABHAI SAKARIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHRI TULSHIBHAI POLABHAI SAKARIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHRI NITINBHAI T. BHUPTANI, L.I.C,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-4,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

ATMAN RAJNIKANT BHESDADIYA L/R. LATE SHRI RAJNIKANT LAVJIBHAI BHEDADIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT