BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 272A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai46Bangalore27Delhi27Ahmedabad14Chandigarh11Chennai10Pune10Cuttack9Kolkata9Jaipur7Lucknow6Hyderabad5Panaji5Surat5Amritsar3Raipur3Rajkot3Nagpur2Agra2Patna2Visakhapatnam1Dehradun1Indore1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1SC1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)5Section 1443Section 1473Section 1483Section 80G3Section 1392Addition to Income2Natural Justice2Deduction2Penalty

ABHAY HARGOVINDBHAI PATEL,JAMNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed, in above terms

ITA 17/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot16 Jul 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri K. L. Solanki, Ld. Sr. (DR)
Section 120(5)Section 133(6)Section 139Section 142(1)Section 144Section 69A

272A(1)(d) r.w.s. 274 of the I.T. Act 1961 was also initiated for non-\ncompliance of notices issued u/s 142(1) of the I.T. Act. During the assessment\nproceedings, the information u/s 133(6) from bank/banks were called for\nregarding bank accounts held by the assessee. On perusal of information received\nfrom bank, it was observed by the assessing

2

KIRAN AMISHKUMAR THAKRAR,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee, is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 247/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot23 Dec 2025AY 2019-20
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115bSection 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234aSection 270aSection 271aSection 272a(1)(d)

d) of the i t act it is totally wrong, unwarranted, unjustified and bad in law.\n8. the learned commissioner of income tax (appeals), national faceless appeal centre has erred in confirming the action of the assessing officer in respect of charging the interest u/s.234a, b c of the i t act it is totally wrong, unwarranted, unjustified

CHINTAN DWARKADAS CHOTAI,JUNAGADH vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR 1(1), RKT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee, is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 636/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot07 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 80G

272A(1)(d) for noncompliance of Notice 4. The appellant craves to leave, to alter, to amend and/or withdraw any of the grounds or ground of appeal either before or at the time of appellate hearing.” 3. At the outset, that the appeal filed late by 165 days. The Ld. AR of the assessee has filed an application for condonation