SHRI AJAY LALCHAND BHANSALI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-1 (2) (5), RAJKOT, RAJKOT
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 135/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot23 Jan 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiand Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.135/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: (2017-18) Ajay Lalchand Bhansali. Ito Ward-1(2)(5), Rajkot. बनाम Swastik Traders, Opp. Pgvcl Vs. Office, Dhebar Road, Rajkot. Pan/Gir No.Acypb6253E "थायीलेखासं /. जीआइआरसं /. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) .. (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sunny Mehta, Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr
For Appellant: Shri Sunny Mehta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271A(1)(d)
section 271A(1)(d) of the IT Act.
(9). The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law by not issuing a speaking order and also by issuing order in just one line without actually verifying the submission made and evidences produced.
(10). Without prejudice to the above your appellant craves leave to add, alter, vary, or withdraw