BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 115Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai166Delhi121Kolkata49Ahmedabad26Chennai13Bangalore10Surat9Jaipur9Pune5Karnataka3Guwahati3Nagpur3Rajkot3Punjab & Haryana1Telangana1Hyderabad1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 10A21Section 115J10Section 143(3)2Section 271(1)(c)2Addition to Income2Exemption2Deduction2Disallowance2

SEABIRD MARINE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMNAGAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 1, JAMNAGAR, JAMANGAR

In the result, ground No.4 raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 83/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 May 2025AY 2017-18
Section 114Section 115JSection 143(3)

115J.\n6. The second question framed by us hereinabove arises for our conside-ration in the following\nfactual background. The assessee-company in its books of account had shown certain sums of\nmoney representing as 'dividend' from units of the UTI and had included the said sums in the\ncomputation of its profit as an income from 'eligible business

THE ITO, WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. M/S D. JEWEL,, JUNAGADH

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 15/RJT/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot
24 Jun 2022
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.15/Rjt/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2013-2014 Income Tax Officer, M/S. D. Jewel, Ward-2, Vs. 1-Shishu Mangal Road, Junagadh. Gandhigram, Junagadh.

For Appellant: Shri Samir Jani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Rathi, Sr.D.R
Section 10ASection 115J

disallowed outrightly. Page 11 of 14 Asstt. Year 2013-14 The mentioning of section 80-IB was only clerical mistake and with all fairness as per the facts and circumstances and as per the previous claims in tax calculation under section 115J

THE ITO, WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. M/S D. JEWEL,, JUNAGADH

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 350/RJT/2017[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot24 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.350/Rjt/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2013-2014 Income Tax Officer, M/S. D. Jewel, Ward-2, Vs. 1-Shishu Mangal Road, Junagadh. Gandhigram, Junagadh.

For Appellant: Shri Hersh Samirbhai Jani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr.D.R
Section 10ASection 115JSection 271(1)(c)

disallowed outrightly. The mentioning of section 80-IB was only clerical mistake and with all fairness as per the facts and circumstances and as per the previous claims in tax calculation under section 115J