BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “depreciation”+ Section 156clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi438Mumbai370Chennai136Bangalore134Kolkata79Ahmedabad75Jaipur46Raipur41Hyderabad34Chandigarh33Pune32Visakhapatnam27Lucknow19Indore18Cuttack17Surat14Karnataka12Cochin11Guwahati11SC10Rajkot10Agra6Ranchi5Telangana4Amritsar4Varanasi3Jodhpur3Dehradun2Allahabad2Nagpur1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 80I22Section 2509Section 143(3)9Section 80P(2)(b)9Deduction9Section 808Disallowance7Section 801C6Section 2636Addition to Income

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

In the result, summarised and concise ground No

ITA 249/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 247 To 250 & 260/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2017-18 2018-19 & 2010-11 Bhawani Industries India Llp Assistant Commissioner Of बनाम/ Income-Tax, Cicle-2(1), Rajkot, C/1-B, 236/3 Gidc, Aji Industrial Room No.311, 3Rd Floor, Aaykar Estate, Rajkot-36 003 Vs. Bhawan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacfb 8046 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.254 To 256/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Bhawani Industries India Llp Assistant Commissioner Of Income- C/1-B, 236/3 Gidc, Aji बनाम/ Tax, Cicle-2(1), Rajkot, Room No.311, Industrial Estate, Rajkot-36 3Rd Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Race Vs. 003 Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacfb 8046 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit-Dr & Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT-DR &
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80I
6
Section 80P(2)(d)2
Penalty2

156/-, which was not claimed in original return of income. [This is Ground No.3 of Revenue`s appeal in ITA No.260/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2010-11, Ground No.3 in ITA No.247/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2012-13, Ground No.3 in ITA No.248/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2013-14 ] (4) The Ld. CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in law and on facts in deleting to disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC

BHAVANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, summarised and concise ground No

ITA 256/RJT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 247 To 250 & 260/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2017-18 2018-19 & 2010-11 Bhawani Industries India Llp Assistant Commissioner Of बनाम/ Income-Tax, Cicle-2(1), Rajkot, C/1-B, 236/3 Gidc, Aji Industrial Room No.311, 3Rd Floor, Aaykar Estate, Rajkot-36 003 Vs. Bhawan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacfb 8046 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.254 To 256/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Bhawani Industries India Llp Assistant Commissioner Of Income- C/1-B, 236/3 Gidc, Aji बनाम/ Tax, Cicle-2(1), Rajkot, Room No.311, Industrial Estate, Rajkot-36 3Rd Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Race Vs. 003 Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacfb 8046 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit-Dr & Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT-DR &
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80I

156/-, which was not claimed in original return of income. [This is Ground No.3 of Revenue`s appeal in ITA No.260/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2010-11, Ground No.3 in ITA No.247/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2012-13, Ground No.3 in ITA No.248/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2013-14 ] (4) The Ld. CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in law and on facts in deleting to disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC

SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT CO OP PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,SURENDRANAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURENDRANAGAR CIRCLE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 429/RJT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 429/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2014-15) Surendranagar District Co. Op. Acit, Circle, Producers Union Ltd. Vs. Surendranagar-363035 Plot No.249, Phase 2 Gidc Market Yard Circle, Sursagar Dairy, Wadhwan Road, Surendranagar-363035 (Guj) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaas8375B (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : Heard On 09/10/2025, Refixed For Clarification On 03.11.2025 & Finally Heard On 02.02.2026 : 10/02/2026 Date Of Pronouncement Order Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 80P(2)(b)Section 80P(2)(d)

depreciation, the net income of Rs. 92,40,586/- has been shown. The net business income is claimed as deduction u/s 80P(2)(b) of the Act, in the return filed by the assessee. However, during the course of assessment proceedings, the deduction of interest is disallowed and the net interest income of Rs. 34,79,487/- has been treated

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

ITA 248/RJT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Aug 2025AY 2013-14
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 80Section 801CSection 80I

156/-, which was not claimed in original return of income. [This is Ground No.3 of Revenue's appeal in ITA No.260/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2010-11, Ground No.3 in ITA No.247/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2012-13, Ground No.3 in ITA No.248/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2013-14] (4) The Ld. CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in law and on facts in deleting to disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC

ASSISTANT COMMISSINER OF IINCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

ITA 260/RJT/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Aug 2025AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 80Section 801CSection 80I

156/-, which was not claimed in original return of income. [This is Ground No.3 of Revenue's appeal in ITA No.260/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2010-11, Ground No.3 in ITA No.247/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2012-13, Ground No.3 in ITA No.248/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2013-14] (4) The Ld. CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in law and on facts in deleting to disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC

BHAVANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 255/RJT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Aug 2025AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 80Section 801CSection 80I

156/-, which was not claimed in original return of income. [This is Ground No.3 of Revenue's appeal in ITA No.260/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2010-11, Ground No.3 in ITA No.247/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2012-13, Ground No.3 in ITA No.248/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2013-14] (4) The Ld. CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in law and on facts in deleting to disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

ITA 247/RJT/2024[2012]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Aug 2025
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 80Section 801CSection 80I

156/-, which was not claimed in original return of income. [This is Ground No.3 of Revenue's appeal in ITA No.260/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2010-11, Ground No.3 in ITA No.247/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2012-13, Ground No.3 in ITA No.248/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2013-14] (4) The Ld. CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in law and on facts in deleting to disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC

BHAVANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP,RAJKOT vs. ADDI. CIT, RANGE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 254/RJT/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Aug 2025AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 80Section 801CSection 80I

156/-, which was not claimed in original return of income. [This is Ground No.3 of Revenue's appeal in ITA No.260/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2010-11, Ground No.3 in ITA No.247/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2012-13, Ground No.3 in ITA No.248/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2013-14] (4) The Ld. CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in law and on facts in deleting to disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

ITA 250/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Aug 2025AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 80Section 801CSection 80I

156/-, which was not claimed in original return of income. [This is Ground No.3 of Revenue's appeal in ITA No.260/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2010-11, Ground No.3 in ITA No.247/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2012-13, Ground No.3 in ITA No.248/RJT/2024 for A.Y.2013-14] (4) The Ld. CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in law and on facts in deleting to disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC

THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. SMT. MANISHABEN N. MASHRU,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 355/RJT/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Jan 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Rajpal Yadavsr.No.

For Appellant: Shri M.J. Ranpura, CAFor Respondent: Shri Hargovind Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

156. According to the ld.CIT(A) after 1.4.1989 the assessee was not supposed to bring demonstrative evidence on record to show that debts have actually become bad. It is sufficient if these amounts have been written off in its accounts. After considering the finding of the ld.CIT(A) we do not find any merit in this ground of appeal