SALIM ABDULLAH RATHOD,MUNDRA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, for statistical purposes
ITA 277/RJT/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot07 Apr 2026AY 2010-11
Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 277/Rjt/2023 ("नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2012-13) Salim Abdullah Rathod, Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax, 6316, Swami Vivekanand Nagar New Vs. Gandhidham Kutch, Gujarat Swaminarayan Temple Road Bhutda 370465 Wadi, Gujarat, 370465 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adnpp3110E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri R. B. Gohil, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147
132
has laid down the real test for claiming depreciation at higher rates applicable for "motor lorring used in business of running them on hire. We note that at perusal the order of assessment, the AO has framed an order under Section-143(3) of the Act, however in the assessment proceeding, the AO has rejected the books of accounts