ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

In the result, summarised and concise ground No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 247 To 250 & 260/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2017-18 2018-19 & 2010-11 Bhawani Industries India Llp Assistant Commissioner Of बनाम/ Income-Tax, Cicle-2(1), Rajkot, C/1-B, 236/3 Gidc, Aji Industrial Room No.311, 3Rd Floor, Aaykar Estate, Rajkot-36 003 Vs. Bhawan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacfb 8046 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.254 To 256/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Bhawani Industries India Llp Assistant Commissioner Of Income- C/1-B, 236/3 Gidc, Aji बनाम/ Tax, Cicle-2(1), Rajkot, Room No.311, Industrial Estate, Rajkot-36 3Rd Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Race Vs. 003 Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacfb 8046 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit-Dr & Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr

10 to 15% by parts suppliers. With these intention to optimize our profitability. We had planned to set up dedicated unit at Rudrapur exclusively for Tata Motors Ltd Rudrapur and our investment in land factory building and plant machinery etc are of Rs. 12,92,60,168/-(W.D. V as at 30/03/2011).” 17.2 The assessee has also made available

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S SAURASHTRA GRAMIN BANK,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royअपील सं./Ita No.376/Rjt/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 D.C.I.T., M/S. Saurashtra Gramin Bank, Circle-3(1), Vs. Gopalnaga, Opp. Andh Mahila Rajkot. Vikas Gruh, Rajkot.

10(34) of the Act. Likewise the assessee has made the disallowance of Rs. 6,08,247/- equivalent to the amount of exempted income under the provisions of section 14A read with rule 8D of Income Tax Rule. 20.1 However, the AO being dissatisfied with the working of the disallowance made by the assessee, computed the disallowance under section

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. GANDHI REALITY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm

10. The assessee submitted that there were various commercial reasons of the merger, like, as enumerated in para 1.1.3, all the companies were engaged in different activities but in relation to real estate sector. Hence even though doing different business activities the businesses of all the three companies complimented each other. There was a high scope of gaining financial

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, JAMNAGAR vs. M/S. DEEP RECYCLING IND.,, JAMNAGAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

15. The assessee in the year under consideration has worked out the deduction u/s 10B of the Act without claiming any deduction on account of interest and remuneration to the partners. As per the assessee, the partnership deed was amended w.e.f 01.04.2009 wherein the interest/ remuneration to the partners was denied. The assessee also claimed that once

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2,, JAMNAGAR vs. M/S. DEEP RECYCLOING INDUSTRIES,, JAMNAGAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

15. The assessee in the year under consideration has worked out the deduction u/s 10B of the Act without claiming any deduction on account of interest and remuneration to the partners. As per the assessee, the partnership deed was amended w.e.f 01.04.2009 wherein the interest/ remuneration to the partners was denied. The assessee also claimed that once

THE ASSISTANT COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM vs. M/S H.D. ENTERPRISE,, BHUJ

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysr. Asstt. Name Of Name Of Ita No. No. Year Appellant Respondent Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. H.D. Income-Tax, Enterprise, 1St Floor, Pooja 1. 110/Rjt/2016 2011-12 Gandhidham Circle, Complex, Station Gandhidham- Road, Bhuj-Kutch Kutch Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2. 205/Rjt/2016 2012-13 Gandhidham -Do- Circle, Gandhidham- Kutch 3. 237/Rjt/2016 2013-14 -Do- -Do- (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri M. N. Maurya, Cit Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 25/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement 28/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Orders Dated 11.01.2016, 03.03.2016 & 25.04.2016 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-3, Rajkot Arising Out Of The Orders All Dated 24.03.2014 Passed By The Ita Nos.110,205&237/Rjt/2016 A.Y.2011-12,2012-13&2013-14 Assessing Officer, Gandhidham Under Sections 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For A.Ys. 2011-12, 2012- 13 & 2013-14 Respectively. Since All The Appeals Relate To The Same Assessee & The Issues Are Identical, These Are Heard Analogously & Are Being Disposed By A Common Order.

sections 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred to as “the act”) for A.Ys. 2011-12, 2012- 13 & 2013-14 respectively. Since all the appeals relate to the same assessee, and the issues are identical, these are heard analogously and are being disposed by a common order. ITA No. 110/Rjt/2016 A.Y. 2011-12 is taken

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM vs. M/S H.D. ENTERPRISE,, BHUJ

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysr. Asstt. Name Of Name Of Ita No. No. Year Appellant Respondent Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. H.D. Income-Tax, Enterprise, 1St Floor, Pooja 1. 110/Rjt/2016 2011-12 Gandhidham Circle, Complex, Station Gandhidham- Road, Bhuj-Kutch Kutch Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2. 205/Rjt/2016 2012-13 Gandhidham -Do- Circle, Gandhidham- Kutch 3. 237/Rjt/2016 2013-14 -Do- -Do- (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri M. N. Maurya, Cit Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 25/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement 28/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Orders Dated 11.01.2016, 03.03.2016 & 25.04.2016 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-3, Rajkot Arising Out Of The Orders All Dated 24.03.2014 Passed By The Ita Nos.110,205&237/Rjt/2016 A.Y.2011-12,2012-13&2013-14 Assessing Officer, Gandhidham Under Sections 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For A.Ys. 2011-12, 2012- 13 & 2013-14 Respectively. Since All The Appeals Relate To The Same Assessee & The Issues Are Identical, These Are Heard Analogously & Are Being Disposed By A Common Order.

sections 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred to as “the act”) for A.Ys. 2011-12, 2012- 13 & 2013-14 respectively. Since all the appeals relate to the same assessee, and the issues are identical, these are heard analogously and are being disposed by a common order. ITA No. 110/Rjt/2016 A.Y. 2011-12 is taken

THE ASSISTANT COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM vs. M/S H.D. ENTERPRISE,, BHUJ

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysr. Asstt. Name Of Name Of Ita No. No. Year Appellant Respondent Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. H.D. Income-Tax, Enterprise, 1St Floor, Pooja 1. 110/Rjt/2016 2011-12 Gandhidham Circle, Complex, Station Gandhidham- Road, Bhuj-Kutch Kutch Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2. 205/Rjt/2016 2012-13 Gandhidham -Do- Circle, Gandhidham- Kutch 3. 237/Rjt/2016 2013-14 -Do- -Do- (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri M. N. Maurya, Cit Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 25/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement 28/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Orders Dated 11.01.2016, 03.03.2016 & 25.04.2016 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-3, Rajkot Arising Out Of The Orders All Dated 24.03.2014 Passed By The Ita Nos.110,205&237/Rjt/2016 A.Y.2011-12,2012-13&2013-14 Assessing Officer, Gandhidham Under Sections 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For A.Ys. 2011-12, 2012- 13 & 2013-14 Respectively. Since All The Appeals Relate To The Same Assessee & The Issues Are Identical, These Are Heard Analogously & Are Being Disposed By A Common Order.

sections 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred to as “the act”) for A.Ys. 2011-12, 2012- 13 & 2013-14 respectively. Since all the appeals relate to the same assessee, and the issues are identical, these are heard analogously and are being disposed by a common order. ITA No. 110/Rjt/2016 A.Y. 2011-12 is taken

RAJESHBHAI CHIMANBHAI JAVIA,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.312/Rjt/2014 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2008-2009

section 40(8) was inserted by the Finance No.(2) Act, 2004, even though the Finance Act, 2012 had not specifically stated that proviso is retrospective in nature. The High Court affirmed the ratio laid down by the Agra Tribunal and held that said provisos is declaratory and curative in nature and ha retrospective effect from 1st April

SHRI NITINBHAI T. BHUPTANI, L.I.C,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-4,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar, Accountatn Member & Shri Rajpal Yadavआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 13/Rjt/2016 & 14/Rjt/2016 & 182/Rjt/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-2011, 2011-12 & 2012-13

section 10 are being prescribed under Rule 2BB of the Income tax Rules 1962. In order to claim these allowances, an assessee has to fulfill three conditions namely, (a) the allowance should be prescribed under Rule 2BB of the Income tax Rules, (b) expenses should be incurred wholly, necessarily and exclusively in the performance of duties (C) allowances should

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM vs. M/S P.C. PATEL & COMPANY,, BHUJ

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

10,00,000/- on various expenses claimed by the assessee and also disallowed higher rate of depreciation on Dumper, Tipper etc. @ 30% instead of 15% of depreciation. 3. Aggrieved against the same, the assessee filed an appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the benefit of higher rate of depreciation @ 30% by following the judgment

ALPHA HI-TECH FUEL LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SNR CIRCLE,, SURENDRANAGAR

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.68/Rjt/2009 (धििाधरणणवध/ Assessment Year 2005-06) Alpha Hi-Tech Fuel Limited, बिाम/ D.C.I.T, Station Road, Surendranagar Vs. Lakhtar, Dist. Surendranagar, Gujarat-382775 स्ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaca4258P (अपीला््/Appellant) (प्य््/ Respondent) अपीला््थरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, A.R Shri B.D Gupta, Sr. D.R. प्य््करथरसे/Respondent By: सुिणाईकरतारीख/ Date Of Hearing 08/06/2023 घोवणाकरतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 05/09/2023 आदेश/ O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:

depreciation claimed by the assessee in different year as well as the deductions claimed under section 80I and 80JJA the of the Act in the earlier assessment years. Thus, the period of 10 years for claiming the benefit of deduction under section 80-IA(4) of the Act has already expired from the initial assessment year. 5.1 The AO also

THE ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM vs. M/S P.C. PATEL & CO.,, BHUJ

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2014- 15. I.T.A No. 194/Rjt/2018 A.Y. 2014-15 Page No 2 ACIT Vs. M/s. P C Patel & Co. 2. The brief facts of the case is that the assessee is a Partnership Firm engaged in the business of Earth

SALIM ABDULLAH RATHOD,MUNDRA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 277/Rjt/2023 ("नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2012-13) Salim Abdullah Rathod, Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax, 6316, Swami Vivekanand Nagar New Vs. Gandhidham Kutch, Gujarat Swaminarayan Temple Road Bhutda 370465 Wadi, Gujarat, 370465 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adnpp3110E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

10-11, 9-10, 7-8, 6-7. The Ld. DR for the revenue has also relied on the judgment “Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Gupta Global Exim 305 ITR 132 has laid down the real test for claiming depreciation at higher rates applicable for "motor lorring used in business of running them on hire. We note that

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(2),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. RAJKOT PEOPLES CO. OP. BANK LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed except CO of the assessee in the Asstt

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Rajpal Yadavsr.

15,361/- as an exempt under section 10(34) of the Act. The ld.AO in a brief finding observed that the expenditure attributable to earning of this exempt income deserves to be disallowed under section 14A of the Act r.w.s Rule 8D of IT Rules. He worked out a sum of Rs.83,352/- for disallowance. On appeal, the ld.CIT

ASSISTANT COMMISSINER OF IINCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

10 to 15% by parts suppliers. With these intention to optimize assessee's profitability, the assessee had planned to set up dedicated unit-1, at Rudrapur exclusively for Tata Motors Ltd, Rudrapur and assessee`s investment in land, factory building and plant machinery etc, are of Rs. 9,83,31,638/- (W.D.V. as at 30/03/2010).The assessee is manufacturing many

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. BHAWANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP, RAJKOT

10 to 15% by parts suppliers. With these intention to optimize assessee's profitability, the assessee had planned to set up dedicated unit-1, at Rudrapur exclusively for Tata Motors Ltd, Rudrapur and assessee`s investment in land, factory building and plant machinery etc, are of Rs. 9,83,31,638/- (W.D.V. as at 30/03/2010).The assessee is manufacturing many

BHAVANI INDUSTRIES INDIA LLP,RAJKOT vs. ADDI. CIT, RANGE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

10 to 15% by parts suppliers. With these intention to optimize assessee's profitability, the assessee had planned to set up dedicated unit-1, at Rudrapur exclusively for Tata Motors Ltd, Rudrapur and assessee`s investment in land, factory building and plant machinery etc, are of Rs. 9,83,31,638/- (W.D.V. as at 30/03/2010).The assessee is manufacturing many