BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 275clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka102Mumbai65Chandigarh61Ahmedabad61Delhi54Jaipur54Chennai43Kolkata40Hyderabad34Bangalore32Surat25Cochin20Cuttack14Nagpur13Lucknow10Pune9Indore7Patna4Visakhapatnam4Panaji3Rajkot2Jodhpur1Andhra Pradesh1Calcutta1Jabalpur1Agra1Raipur1Rajasthan1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 1544Section 143(1)3Section 143(2)2

SMT. SHEETAL RASHMIN PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE I. T. O. WARD-2, GANDHIDHAM, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, for statistical\npurposes

ITA 182/RJT/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Sept 2025AY 2007-08
Section 142ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)

275, it was held that in the absence of\nan affidavit or other evidence supporting the claim of non-receipt, the court may\nreject such claims.\n8. Conclusion: In light of the above, we respectfully request that the delay in filing\nthe appeal be not condoned, as the assessee's claim of non-receipt of the order\ndue to relocation

SHRI SHANTILAL MALTIPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,JAMNAGAR. vs. THE ASST. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX & THE ITO-TDS-CIRCLE-1,, JAMNAGAR

In the result, ITA No.275/Rjt/2018 is allowed for statistical purposes whereas

ITA 275/RJT/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Rajkot
01 Jun 2020
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Madhumita Roy)

For Appellant: Shri D. S. Varia, ARFor Respondent: Shri Suhas Mistry, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 154

delay in filing the appeal before the learned CIT (A) for two and half years which was not condoned by the learned CIT (A). Accordingly the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed. 5. It was explained by the learned AR for the assessee that the assessee has filed online rectification application under section 154 of the Act against