CHIMANLAL BHUTALAL SAGAR,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 126/RJT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jun 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 126/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (208-19) (Hybrid Hearing) Chimanlal Bhutalal Sagar Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income C/.O Ca Himansu Gandhi, 10Th Floor, D Tax (International Taxation)-1, Wing, Trade World Building, Kamala Room N.312, Ito, Amruta Mills Compaund, Lower Parle – 400013 Building, Nr. Girnar Cinema, M. G. Road, Gujarat – 360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Fdmps3665D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Himansu Gandhi, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 01/05/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/06/2025
For Appellant: Shri Himansu Gandhi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 144CSection 147Section 234ASection 250Section 271ASection 69
section 271AAC(1) of Income
Tax Act, 1961. 10. Appellant craves leave to add further grounds or to amend or hearing. alter the existing grounds of appeal on or before the date of hearing.
11. Whether there is any delay in filing of appeal (if yes please attach application seeking condonation of delay)
3. At the outset, that the appeal