ARVINDKUMAR DAYALAL CHAVDA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-2 (2) (3), RAJKOT
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 841/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jun 2025AY 2019-20
Bench: Dr. A. L. Saini, Am & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 841/Rjt/2024 Assessment Year: (2019-20) Arvindkumar Dayalal Chavda Vs. Ito, Ward – 2(2)(3), Rajkot 3 – Nilay, Maruti Nagar, Opp. New Aayakar Bhavan, Vatiaka, Krishnam Appartment, Airport Road, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot – 360001 Rajkot-360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abzpc0502D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Kumar Pandya, Ar Respondent By Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 26/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/06/2025
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 246Section 250
246(A) before CIT(A) With 30/06/2024 945 days delay with Delay Condone Application by Assessee delay condone
Application.
5
Order u/s 250. Video Conference for Oral
24/10/2024 116 days
Evidence is requested n Appeal which is not given by Income Tax Department before issue of Order u/s 250. The Learned Counsel for the assessee argued that order
