Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234E(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2069 Section 234E8 TDS8

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,DIST. RAJKOT vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, all these appeal appeals of the assessee i

ITA 227/RJT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. Before Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. Before Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. & Shri Diesh Mohan Sinhashri Diesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr

Section 206

section 206C of the I.T. Act) on 12.03.2021 and going to file on 15.03.2021. and going to file on 15.03.2021. The AO has made an order u/s. 234E of the Act The AO has made an order u/s. 234E of the Act for non-filing of TCS statement and raised a demand of Rs.2,57,530/ filing of TCS statement

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,RAJKOT vs. ITO, TDS-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, all these appeal appeals of the assessee i

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,DIST. RAJKOT vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,RAJKOT vs. ITO, TDS-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,DIST. RAJKOT vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,RAJKOT vs. ITO, TDS-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,DIST. RAJKOT vs. THE ITO(TDS), WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,RAJKOT vs. ITO, TDS-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

VIMALBHAI MOHANBHAI NARIYA PROP. S.M. CORPORATION,,JAMNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3, , JAMNAGAR

NIRAJ TRANSPOZAL,JAMNAGAR vs. THE CIT(APPEALS), JAMNAGAR

NIRAJ TRANSPOZAL,JAMNAGAR vs. THE CIT(APPEALS), JAMNAGAR

NIRAJ TRANSPOZAL,JAMNAGAR vs. THE CIT (APPEALS), JAMNAGAR