Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 227clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2068 TDS4

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,RAJKOT vs. ITO, TDS-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, all these appeal appeals of the assessee i

ITA 148/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. Before Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. Before Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. & Shri Diesh Mohan Sinhashri Diesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr

Section 206

delay in filing the appeal may kindly be condoned and may please be admitted and y be condoned and may please be admitted and decided on merits by exercising the powers conferred in the ITAT vide provisions of decided on merits by exercising the powers conferred in the ITAT vide provisions of decided on merits by exercising the powers conferred

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,DIST. RAJKOT vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, all these appeal appeals of the assessee i

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,RAJKOT vs. ITO, TDS-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,DIST. RAJKOT vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,RAJKOT vs. ITO, TDS-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,DIST. RAJKOT vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,RAJKOT vs. ITO, TDS-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ARHAM ENTERPRISE,DIST. RAJKOT vs. THE ITO(TDS), WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SANJAYKUMAR DHIRUBHAI HIRPARA,KHAMBHA vs. AO, ITO, WARD-3(1)(2), RAJKOT