Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 144C(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi134 Mumbai98 Kolkata36 Hyderabad36 Chennai32 Bangalore31 Jaipur12 Pune12 Ahmedabad11 Nagpur5 Chandigarh5 Visakhapatnam4 Indore4 Rajkot3 Dehradun2 Calcutta1 Raipur1 SC1 Lucknow1 Agra1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 1474 Section 694 Section 1484 Section 144C(2)2 Section 148A2 Section 2502 Penalty2 Addition to Income2

M/S. KANDLA ENERGY AND CHEMICALS LTD.,VILLAGE DEVALIYA, TAL. ANJAR(KUTCH) vs. ADD. CIT, GANDHIDHAM RANGE,, GANDHIDHAM(KUTCH)

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 399/RJT/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot15 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(2)Section 144C(2)(b)Section 144C(3)Section 40A(2)(b)Section 92CSection 92E

3) of the Act and served the same on the assessee on 21.12.2017. As rightly pointed by the Ld. DRP, there is no power u/s. 144C of the Act for the DRP to condone the delay. The powers of the DRP are exhaustively set out in section

M/S. KANDLA ENERGY AND CHEMICALS LTD.,VILLAGE DEVALIYA, TAL. ANJAR(KUTCH) vs. ADD. CIT, GANDHIDHAM RANGE,, GANDHIDHAM(KUTCH)

M/S. KANDLA ENERGY AND CHEMICALS LTD.,VILLAGE DEVALIYA, TAL. ANJAR(KUTCH) vs. ADD. CIT, GANDHIDHAM RANGE,, GANDHIDHAM(KUTCH)

MITESHKUMAR DAYALJIBHAI PABARI,BHATIYA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER , RAJKOT

CHIMANLAL BHUTALAL SAGAR,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT