Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 144C(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi82 Mumbai40 Hyderabad22 Kolkata19 Chennai18 Jaipur12 Bangalore9 Ahmedabad8 Pune5 Chandigarh5 Visakhapatnam3 Indore3 Rajkot3 Nagpur2 Dehradun2 Cochin1 Raipur1 Agra1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 1474 Section 694 Section 1484 Section 2502 Section 144C(2)2 Section 148A2 Penalty2 Addition to Income2

M/S. KANDLA ENERGY AND CHEMICALS LTD.,VILLAGE DEVALIYA, TAL. ANJAR(KUTCH) vs. ADD. CIT, GANDHIDHAM RANGE,, GANDHIDHAM(KUTCH)

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 399/RJT/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot15 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(2)Section 144C(2)(b)Section 144C(3)Section 40A(2)(b)Section 92CSection 92E

condone the delay in filing objections before it u/s. 144C(2) of the Act. Further as rightly held by the Ld. DRP as against the final assessment order dated 19.12.2017 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 144C(3) of the Act, the assessee is open to file its appeal before Ld. CIT(A). Therefore the order passed

M/S. KANDLA ENERGY AND CHEMICALS LTD.,VILLAGE DEVALIYA, TAL. ANJAR(KUTCH) vs. ADD. CIT, GANDHIDHAM RANGE,, GANDHIDHAM(KUTCH)

M/S. KANDLA ENERGY AND CHEMICALS LTD.,VILLAGE DEVALIYA, TAL. ANJAR(KUTCH) vs. ADD. CIT, GANDHIDHAM RANGE,, GANDHIDHAM(KUTCH)

MITESHKUMAR DAYALJIBHAI PABARI,BHATIYA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER , RAJKOT

CHIMANLAL BHUTALAL SAGAR,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT