Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai83 Calcutta60 Kolkata58 Ahmedabad31 Chennai24 Lucknow18 Delhi16 Jaipur15 Chandigarh13 Surat11 Hyderabad10 Varanasi5 Bangalore5 Guwahati5 Indore5 Cuttack4 Pune4 Rajkot3 Telangana2 Patna2 Agra1 Orissa1 Raipur1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 1478 Section 1486 Section 142(1)4 Section 2503 Penny Stock3 Reopening of Assessment3 Addition to Income3 Section 1442 Section 692

SAPNA NAINESH JATANIA,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, in ITA No

ITA 449/RJT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR

Section 120(5)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69

condone the delay in both appeals. 3. Since, the issues involved in all the appeals are common and identical; therefore, these appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. For the sake of convenience, the grounds as well as the facts narrated in ITA No.449/RJT/2025, for assessment Year 2012-13, have been taken into

SAPNA NAINESH JATANIA,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

SAPNA NAINESH JATANIA,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

SAPNA NAINESH JATANIA,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), DWARKA, DWARKA

JITENDRABHAI DEVAJIBHAI BODAR,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT