RAJKOT JILLA GAYATRI PARIVAR TRUST,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE COMMR. OF INCOME TAX-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.52/Rjt/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : - ) Rajkot Jilla Gayatri Parivar The Commissioner Of बनाम/ Trust Income-Tax-I Vs. 7-Vashalinagar Rajkot Opp. Amrapali Cinema Raiya Road, Rajkot "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : None (Written Submission) ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Jitendra Kumar, Cit-Dr

trust are mixed as these cover religious and charitable activities. Therefore the Ld. CIT was of the view that the assessee does not deserve to get the certificate under section 80G(5) of the Act as per explanation 3 to section 80G of the Act. Accordingly the Ld. CIT rejected the registration application of the assessee. 6. Being aggrieved

SHRI NANABHAI BHARVAD SEVA SAMAJ GUJRAT,RAJKOT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

charitable trust, also it has violated the provision of clause(ii) of sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act and hence the assessee is not entitled to get approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, therefore the assessee`s application filed in Form 10AB, u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected. 7. Aggrieved by the order

SHREE SANATAN ASHRAM CHARITABLE TRUST,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2 (4),, AMRELI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.178/Rjt/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2011-12) Shree Santan Ashram The I.T.O. बनाम/ Charitable Trust Ward-2(4) Vs. Shree Chamunda Temple Amreli Vankiya Bhod Khamba "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aajts 7402 B .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : None (Written Submission) ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.Dr

Charitable Trust vs. ITO Asst.Year 2011-12 7. The assessee without prejudice to the above also submitted that it is entitled to the deduction under section 57(iii) of the Act on account of the expenses claimed against its gross receipts. 8. However, the ld. CIT(A) disagreed with the contention of the assessee by observing that the amendment made

SHREE AMRELI MODH VANIK COMMUNITY PROPERTY,AMRELI vs. THE CIT-(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the grounds raised by the assessee are found devoid of merits and the same is hereby rejected

Bench: Granting Registration. The Assessee Has Not Replied To The Above Notice, After Two Reminders, The Assessee Submitted The Details Stating That The Trust Is Maintaining & Providing Property Prominently Known As “Modh Mahajan Vadi” To The Modh Mahajan & Other Communities People On Various Occasions Of Marriage, Social Gathering, Social Events, Lecturers Etc., Along With Other Charitable Activities For General Benefits Of Community & Public At Large & Regularly Complying All The Provisions Of The Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, Including Filing Audit Reports & Giving Charity Contribution To The Charity Commissioner Regularly.

section 12AA of the Act was rejected. 3. Aggrieved against the same, the assessee is in appeal before us raising the following Grounds of Appeal: 1. The Ld. C.I.T. has erred in law and facts in rejecting application for registration U/s. 12A filed by the appellant. The appellant deserves registration. 2. The Ld. C.I.T. has erred in law and facts

KRUPA VILAS GAU SEVA TRUST,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 162/Rjt/2023 (Assessment Year: Na) (Hybrid Hearing)

Charitable Trust (supra) dealt with only the issue/terminology of “whichever is earlier” which is applicable to new trust which have created recently, and it does not deal with condonation of delay in case of old trust who made the application before ld CIT(E ) very late, that is, the issue mention in clause (iii) of 3rd proviso of section

MORBI PLOT JAIN TAP GACHH SANGH,,MORBI vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX(CPC),, BANGLORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

27,12,977/- u/s. 11 of the I.T. Act. However, the Assessing Officer of CPC, Bangalore has not allowed the claim of the exemption u/s. 11 on the ground that assessee trust has not mentioned the details of registration no. as evidence of registration u/s. 12A on the return of income. Before the ld. CIT(A) the assessee has submitted

SWAMINARAYAN SEVA NIKETAN,,JUNAGADH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2,, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Amarjit Singh) [Through Virtual Court]

Section 12(2) r.w.s 11(1) of the Act while computing the assessed income of the Appellant. 4. The Appellant craves leave to add, amend, delete or alter one or more grounds of appeal. 2. Facts of the case are that the assessee is registered as trust with Assistant Charity Commissioner, Junagadh vide registration No.B-1722-Junagadh. The trust has been created

MEENA SAMAJ SEVA SAMITI TRUST,GANDHIDHAM vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

charitable purpose, subject to concession granted under Sec. 80G(5B) of the Act. Therefore, Ld.CIT(E) has denied the approval under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act') and also cancelled the provisional approval of the assessee-trust. 6. Aggrieved by the order of Ld.CIT(E), assessee is in appeal before

KAKADIYA PARIVARNA KULDEVI SHREE BRAHMANI KHODIYAR TRUST,AMRELI vs. THE ITO EXEMPTION, WARD(2), RAJKOT., RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiassessment Year: (2021-2022) Kakadiya Parivarna Kuldevi Sghree The Ito Exemption Brahmani Khodiyar Trust Ward-2, Rajkot. Vs. Jaysukhbhai Laljibhai Kakadiya Jarkhida, Ta. Lathi, Amreli Pan : Aadtk 1328 E (Assessee) (Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld.Sr.Dr

27-02-2023 u/s 154 dated 24-01-2023 2nd Rectification application filed by assessee u/s 154 24-02-2023 online KakadiyaParivarnaKuldevi Shree Brahmani Khodiyar Trust 2nd Order u/s 154 upholding adjustments made u/s 24-02-2023 143(1) CIT(A) order dismissing the appeal of the Assessee 17-01-2025 2nd Appeal filed by the Assessee before

SHRI SWAMI VIVEKANAND TRUST,ADIPUR vs. THE ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.902/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shri Swami Vivekanand Trust The Ito (Exemption) बनाम Plot No.1, Dc-2 Ward-1 Rambaug Road Rajkot. Vs. Ward-6A, Adipur. Pan : Aabts 1102 L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 28/01/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28/03/2025 Order Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Chennai[In Short ‘Ld.Cit(A)/Nfac’], Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’), Dated 02.05.2024, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Intimation Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Cpc) U/S 143(1) Of The Act, Dated 31.10.2015. Shri Swami Vivekanand Trust 2 2. Grievances Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal Are As Under:

27-03-2017 Shri Swami Vivekanand Trust 5 9.We note that the CBDT has issued instruction about the requirement of filing audit report along with return of income, whether it is mandatory or not, which is reproduced as under: REQUIREMENT OF FILING AUIDT REPORT ALONG WITH RETURN, WHETHER MANDATORY CBDT INSTRUCTION F.NO.267/482/77-IT(PART), DATED

SHREE SAMAST VARIA PRAJAPATI GNATI,WAKANER, DIST. RAJKOT vs. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), , AHMEDABAD

In the result, the matter is set aside to the Principal CIT with the above directions

Bench: The Actual Hearing Take P1Ace.”

trust under section 12AA of the Act on 27-03-2017, along with the registration certificate issued by the Charity Commissioner. The PCIT requisitioned the assessee to file certain details, but since the assessee did not file the necessary details as requisitioned by the Principal CIT, he dismissed the application of the assessee by holding that vide submission dated

SHREE GAMARA SAMAJIK SEVA MANDAL,,SURENDRANAGAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2014-15

27 SOT 423 Delhi ITAT. . 5. Even if there is some suspicion regarding income as well as resources rejection was not approve by the Hon. P& H HIGH COURT 221 TAXMAN. 6. When refusal of registration without making any adverse comment of the genuine activity and the charitable nature of the object registration was directed to grant

SORTHIYA AHIR GNATINO UTARO,BHAVNATH, JUNAGADH vs. THE ADIT (CPC), BANGALORE, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

27-06-2020 informing that Form No. 10B was uploaded on 18-02-2020 along with the Revised Return and therefore requested to grant the benefit of exemption u/s. 11(2) of the Act. The above Rectification Petition was rejected vide order dated 14.08.2020 on the ground that as per section 13(9), exemption u/s. 11(2) is allowed

THE ASSISTANT COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S KUTCH SALT & ALLIED INDUSTRIES LTD.,, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhait (Ss)A No.233& 234 & 235 & 236 /Rjt/2016 Assessment Year: (2009-10 To 2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. M/S. Kutch Salt & Allied Gandhidham Circle, Industries Ltd., Gandhidham - Kutch Maitri Bhavan, Plot No.-18, Sector-8, Gandhidham - Kutch "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaact1769L (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable purpose, the prudence of the businessman himself in making the interest-free advance is critically relevant and possibly decisive for a finding of business expediency, particularly if and when the recipient of interest free funds is also taxed at maximum rate. The facts of the case, in our view are also thus squarely covered by the Supreme Court decisions

THE ASSISTANT COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S KUTCH SALT & ALLIED INDUSTRIES LTD.,, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhait (Ss)A No.233& 234 & 235 & 236 /Rjt/2016 Assessment Year: (2009-10 To 2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. M/S. Kutch Salt & Allied Gandhidham Circle, Industries Ltd., Gandhidham - Kutch Maitri Bhavan, Plot No.-18, Sector-8, Gandhidham - Kutch "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaact1769L (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable purpose, the prudence of the businessman himself in making the interest-free advance is critically relevant and possibly decisive for a finding of business expediency, particularly if and when the recipient of interest free funds is also taxed at maximum rate. The facts of the case, in our view are also thus squarely covered by the Supreme Court decisions

THE ASSISTANT COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. M/S KUTCH SALT & ALLIED INDUSTRIES LTD.,, GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH

In the result, cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhait (Ss)A No.233& 234 & 235 & 236 /Rjt/2016 Assessment Year: (2009-10 To 2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. M/S. Kutch Salt & Allied Gandhidham Circle, Industries Ltd., Gandhidham - Kutch Maitri Bhavan, Plot No.-18, Sector-8, Gandhidham - Kutch "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaact1769L (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable purpose, the prudence of the businessman himself in making the interest-free advance is critically relevant and possibly decisive for a finding of business expediency, particularly if and when the recipient of interest free funds is also taxed at maximum rate. The facts of the case, in our view are also thus squarely covered by the Supreme Court decisions

THE ASSISTANT COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S KUTCH SALT & ALLIED INDUSTRIES LTD.,, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhait (Ss)A No.233& 234 & 235 & 236 /Rjt/2016 Assessment Year: (2009-10 To 2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. M/S. Kutch Salt & Allied Gandhidham Circle, Industries Ltd., Gandhidham - Kutch Maitri Bhavan, Plot No.-18, Sector-8, Gandhidham - Kutch "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaact1769L (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable purpose, the prudence of the businessman himself in making the interest-free advance is critically relevant and possibly decisive for a finding of business expediency, particularly if and when the recipient of interest free funds is also taxed at maximum rate. The facts of the case, in our view are also thus squarely covered by the Supreme Court decisions

THE ASSISTANT COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S KUTCH SALT & ALLIED INDUSTRIES LTD.,, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhait (Ss)A No.233& 234 & 235 & 236 /Rjt/2016 Assessment Year: (2009-10 To 2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. M/S. Kutch Salt & Allied Gandhidham Circle, Industries Ltd., Gandhidham - Kutch Maitri Bhavan, Plot No.-18, Sector-8, Gandhidham - Kutch "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaact1769L (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable purpose, the prudence of the businessman himself in making the interest-free advance is critically relevant and possibly decisive for a finding of business expediency, particularly if and when the recipient of interest free funds is also taxed at maximum rate. The facts of the case, in our view are also thus squarely covered by the Supreme Court decisions