BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 132clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi97Mumbai88Chennai74Hyderabad69Bangalore55Supreme Court50Jaipur42Chandigarh32Pune32Amritsar19Ahmedabad18Kolkata18Allahabad16Visakhapatnam12Lucknow11Surat10Cochin9Indore8Patna6Dehradun6Nagpur5Agra4Jodhpur3Rajkot3Raipur2Cuttack2

Key Topics

Section 80G9Section 12A5Section 80G(5)4Section 80G(5)(iii)3Section 12A(1)(ac)2Charitable Trust2Exemption2

SHRI ANANDABAVA SEDARAT SEVA SANSTHA JAMNAGAR,JAMNAGAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, only for statistical\npurposes in the above terms

ITA 35/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Oct 2025AY 2024-25
For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

132,832/-\n12,79,445/-\n15,412,277/-\n1,60,184/-\n1.04%\n22\n3.\n2020-\n12,892,762/\n32,88,122/-\n16,180,884/-\n1,55,960/-\n0.96%\n21\n6. Considering the replay filed by the assessee the Ld. CIT(E) was of the\nview, the applicant has violated existing main condition of sub-section (5)\nof section

CHINTAN DWARKADAS CHOTAI,JUNAGADH vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR 1(1), RKT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee, is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 636/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot07 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 80G

132 of the Act. The Search operation covered mainly 3 registered unrecognized Political Parties along with 2 Charitable Organizations run by two group of individuals. From the incriminating materials such bogus donation receipts, diaries containing details of commission charged and loose papers containing vital information of transmission of funds, digital data contained in mobile phones/hard-discs etc. being images/WhatsApp chats

AMRELI MODH VANIK COMMUNITY PROPERTY,AMRELI vs. THE PR. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 360/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot29 Sept 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.360/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year: 2024-25 Amreli Modh Vanik Principal Commissioner Of Community Property बनाम Income-Tax(Exemption), Nr. Rajkamal Chowk, Amreli- /Vs. Ahmedabad, 365 601 Room No.609, 6Th Floor, Ayakar Bhawan (Vejalpur), Nr. Sacin Tower 100 Ft Road, Anandnagar Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad-3800 015 "थायीलेखासं /.जीआइआरसं . / Pan/Gir No.: Aagta 8104 R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

132 of the paper book. The Ld. Counsel also submitted that based on the same objects and activities, the trust registration was granted earlier by the Ld.CIT(E), to the assessee-trust. 9. On the other hand, Ld. CIT-DR for the Revenue submitted that assessee has failed to prove the genuineness of the objects and activities. The activities caried