SHRI ANANDABAVA SEDARAT SEVA SANSTHA JAMNAGAR,JAMNAGAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, only for statistical

132,832/- 12,79,445/- 15,412,277/- 1,60,184/- 1.04% 22 3. 2020- 12,892,762/ 32,88,122/- 16,180,884/- 1,55,960/- 0.96% 21 6. Considering the replay filed by the assessee the Ld. CIT(E) was of the view, the applicant has violated existing main condition of sub-section (5) of section

AMRELI MODH VANIK COMMUNITY PROPERTY,AMRELI vs. THE PR. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.360/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year: 2024-25 Amreli Modh Vanik Principal Commissioner Of Community Property बनाम Income-Tax(Exemption), Nr. Rajkamal Chowk, Amreli- /Vs. Ahmedabad, 365 601 Room No.609, 6Th Floor, Ayakar Bhawan (Vejalpur), Nr. Sacin Tower 100 Ft Road, Anandnagar Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad-3800 015 "थायीलेखासं /.जीआइआरसं . / Pan/Gir No.: Aagta 8104 R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia Cit-Dr

132 of the paper book. The Ld. Counsel also submitted that based on the same objects and activities, the trust registration was granted earlier by the Ld.CIT(E), to the assessee-trust. 9. On the other hand, Ld. CIT-DR for the Revenue submitted that assessee has failed to prove the genuineness of the objects and activities. The activities caried