BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

51 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 12(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka366Mumbai180Pune132Delhi113Ahmedabad96Hyderabad89Jaipur88Chennai65Bangalore55Rajkot51Kolkata42Surat38Amritsar31Chandigarh27Calcutta16Nagpur15Indore13Cochin13Visakhapatnam10Jodhpur10Panaji9Agra8Telangana8Cuttack7Patna6Raipur5Lucknow4SC4Varanasi4Ranchi3Dehradun3Jabalpur2Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 12A124Exemption46Section 12A(1)(ac)41Section 80G(5)27Charitable Trust27Section 13(1)(b)18Section 80G14Addition to Income9Section 11

SHREE PARJIYA BRAHMAN ABHYUDAY MANDAL,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, no question of law arises

ITA 327/RJT/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot06 Jan 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.327/Rjt/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (Na) (Hybrid Hearing) Shree Parjiya Brahman Vs. Cit(Exemption) Abhyuday Mandal Ahmedabad Adesarr Rapar, Kutch Rapar, Gujarat 370155 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abeas2267F (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit.Dr Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 06/01/2025 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT.DR
Section 11Section 124(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13(1)(b)

12 would not apply in the case of a trust for charitable purposes or a charitable institution created or established after the commencement of this Act, any income thereof, if the trust or institution is created or established for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste. Therefore, the provision of section 13(1

Showing 1–20 of 51 · Page 1 of 3

7
Section 136
Section 2(15)5
Disallowance5

SHREE BAUA BHAVIK MANDAL NANI TUMBDI,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 367/RJT/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Mar 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.367/Rjt/2023 Assessment Year: (Na) (Hybridhearing) Shree Baua Bhavik Mandal Vs. Cit(Exemption), Nani Tumbdi- Charitable Trust, Ahmedabad.

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT. DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13(1)Section 13(1)(b)

ac)(iii) of the Act. 6. Aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT (E ), the assessee is in appeal before us. 7. Shri Kalpesh Doshi, LearnedCounsel, on behalf of the assessee, argued that CIT(Exemption) has denied the registration of trust stating that section 13(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is applicable to the assessee, whereas trust

KRUPA VILAS GAU SEVA TRUST,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 162/RJT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Mar 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 162/Rjt/2023 (Assessment Year: Na) (Hybrid Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 122A of the Act, till 30.09.2023 where the due date for making such application has expired prior to such date. 9 | P a g e KRUPA VILAS GAU SEVA TRUST, KUTCH - 370240 15. However, in earlier Circular 8/2022, which was issued on 31.03.2022 the CBDT has given instruction about approval

RAJKOT CITY CYBER SECURITY SOCIETY,RAJKOT vs. ITO WD 1(1)(1), RKT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 265/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot18 Aug 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. & Shri Diesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kaushal Dave, Ld. ARFor Respondent: ShriPraveen Verma, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)Section 80G

charitable objectives being pursued in public interest. 4. That the assessee has filed an appeal to challenge the validity of order of the Ld. CIT(E) before us on 28.02.2025. 5. During the course of hearing, Ld. AR submitted that the assessee, because of non submission of document and information is due to registration limitation is newly firm trust. That

GOHEL KELAVANI TRUST,RAJKOT vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS , AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 46/RJT/2024[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot07 Apr 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.46/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : -Na-) Gohel Kelavani Trust बनाम/ The Cit (Exemptions) 112, Aditya Centre, Rajkot Ahmedabad – 380 015 Vs. Rajkot – 360 001 (Gujarat) "ायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaatg 1452 C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ashok Mehta, Ld.Ar Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing 17 /03/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 7 /04/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(E)”], Dated 09/01/2024, Rejecting The Application For Registration Under Section 12Ab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”).

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Mehta, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

12 or section 10(23C) of the Act. In light of such disclosure, the application was rightly filed under section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act. 5.1. The Ld.Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee submitted that, instead of verifying the genuineness of the trust or examining its charitable

SHREE LOLADI MATAJI MADH TRUST,GANDHIDHAM vs. PR. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 836/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot05 May 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.836/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : -Na-) Shree Loladi Mataji Madh बनाम/ The Pr.Cit (Exemptions) Trust Ahmedabad – 380 015 Vs. Shinay, Vagamshi Faliya Shinay Gandhidham – 370 205 (Gujarat) "ायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aayts 3998 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) .. Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing 12 /02/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 05/05/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(E)”], Dated 02/09/2024, Rejecting The Application For Registration Under Section 12Ab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”).

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 10(230)Section 12A

12 or section 10(23C) of the Act. In light of such disclosure, the application was rightly filed under section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act. 5.1. The Ld.Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee submitted that, instead of verifying the genuineness of the trust or examining its charitable

DASHA SHRIMALI KANDOI GNATI,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, for statistical purpose

ITA 96/RJT/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot18 Aug 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Diesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kamal Bhambhani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. SR. DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 13Section 2(15)

charitable for a particular cast, i.e. Dasha Shrimali Kandoi Ganti. However, as per the Explanation 2 of Section 13 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the trust is not created or established for the benefit of the Scheduled castes, backward classes, scheduled tribes or women and children. In addition to the above, our trust was created or established before

SHREE SWAMINARAYAN MANDIR TRUST ,RAMPAR vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD - 1, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose, in above terms

ITA 340/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot06 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.340/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2020-21)

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 69A

charitable organizations. Due to absence of registration, tax liability is fastened even though they may otherwise be eligible for exemption and fulfil other substantive conditions. However, the power of condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A of the Income

RETIRED BANK EMPLOYEES CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BHUJ vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 308/RJT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Apr 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.308/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : -Na-) Retired Bank Employees बनाम/ The Cit (Exemptions) Charitable & Educational Ahmedabad – 380 015 Vs. Trust 2, Sharda Society Bhuj-Kachchh, Bhuj Bhuj – 370 001 (Gujarat) "ायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabar 5167 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) .. Assessee By : Ms. Chaunauti H. Dholakia, Ld.Ar Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing 03 /04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 11 /04/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(E)”], Dated 30/03/2024, Rejecting The Application For Registration Under Section 12Ab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”).

For Appellant: Ms. Chaunauti H. Dholakia, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 10Section 11Section 115TSection 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

trust had duly furnished documents apart from documents uploaded along with the application filed and had also never claimed exemption under section 11, 12 or section 10(23C) of the Act. In light of such disclosure, the application was rightly filed under section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act. 5.1. The Ld.Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee submitted before

SHRI VISHA OSWAL MAHAJAN KHAROI, BHACHAU - KUTCHH - GUJARAT.,BHACHAU-KUTCH-GUJARAT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

ITA 325/RJT/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot09 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.325/Rjt/2023 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2022-23) (Hybrid Hearing) Shri Visha Oswal Mahajan Kharoi, Vs. Cit(Exemption), Room No: 609, 6Th Floor, Aaykar Bhachau – Kutch 370140 Bhuvan, (Vejalpur), 100 Feet Road, Anandnagar Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad 380015 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aapts3740J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Darshak Thakkar, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 02 / 06 /2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 09 / 07 /2025

For Appellant: Shri Darshak Thakkar, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. SR. DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 13(1)(b)

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A is hereby rejected in respect of provisional registration granted to him on 30- 11-2022. 4. That the assessee field an appeal against the impugned order dated 28.07.2023 before these Tribunal. (i) During the course of argument the Ld AR has submitted that the activities of the trust that the activities

SHREE SATYAY MATAJI MANDIR MANGROLIYA PARIVAR TRUST PITHVAJAL,AMRELI vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

ITA 844/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Jul 2025AY 2024-25
For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT-DR
Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

ac)(vi-item(B)\nof the Act, on 19.02.2024. In reference to the application filed by the assessee in\nForm No. 10AB, the assessee was requested to submit certain details/documents\nvide notice dated 06.05.2024 of ld CIT(E ). In response to the said notice, the\nassessee, submitted its reply vide letter dated 31.05.2024 and filed certain\ndetails. However, on perusal

SHREE KHODIYAR GAU SEVA YUVAK MANDAL CHARITABLE TRUST,JAMNAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXM.), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 96/RJT/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.96/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2023-24) Shree Khodiyar Gau Seva बनाम/ The Cit (Exemption) Yuvak Mandal Charitable Ahmedabad – 380 015 Vs. Trust Moti Veraval, Tal. Lalpur Dist. Jamnagar – 361 012 "ायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaxts 8749 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) .. Assessee By : Ms. Amoli Gusani, Ld.Ar Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld.Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Ms. Amoli Gusani, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld.CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12A

12 or section 10(23C) of the Act. In light of such disclosure, the application was rightly filed under section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act. 5.1. The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee submitted that, instead of verifying the genuineness of the trust or examining its charitable

AMRELI MODH VANIK COMMUNITY PROPERTY,AMRELI vs. THE PR. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 360/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot29 Sept 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.360/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year: 2024-25 Amreli Modh Vanik Principal Commissioner Of Community Property बनाम Income-Tax(Exemption), Nr. Rajkamal Chowk, Amreli- /Vs. Ahmedabad, 365 601 Room No.609, 6Th Floor, Ayakar Bhawan (Vejalpur), Nr. Sacin Tower 100 Ft Road, Anandnagar Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad-3800 015 "थायीलेखासं /.जीआइआरसं . / Pan/Gir No.: Aagta 8104 R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

ac)(iii) of the Act was rejected by ld.CIT( E). 6. Aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT(E), the assessee is in appeal before us. 7. Shri Mehul Ranpura, Learned Counsel for the assessee, took us through object clause of the assessee-trust, which is mentioned in the application in Form-10AB, which is placed in paper book pages

JITO GANDHIDHAM CHAPTER,GANDHIDHAM vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

ITA 89/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot09 Oct 2025AY 2024-25
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income-tax Act,\n1961. Therefore, the assessee-trust was requested to submit certain\ndetails/documents vide notice dated 25.07.2024. In response to the said notice,\nthe assessee- trust has submitted certain details. On perusal of objects/objectives\nof the applicant/assessee, as stipulated in the “Memorandum of Association”, it\nwas observed by ld CIT (E) that

LADHABAPA CHARARITABLE AND WELF TRUST,RAJKOT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for Statistical purpose

ITA 928/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 928/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2024-25) (Hybrid Hearing) Ladhabapa Charitable & Welf Trust Vs. Cit (E), Ahmedabad Shraddha Estate 3Rd Floor, Tagore Marg Virani High School Chowk, Rajkot- 363641, Gujarat India "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatl2581K (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bakul. Ganatra, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT (DR)
Section 12ASection 13Section 80G

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is rejected and also your provisional registration stands cancelled. However, the applicant/assessee has failed to file documentary evidences in support of the application.  Genuineness of the trust and its activities.  Consonance of its objectives with its charitable purpose.  Last three years of audited financial statements

SATYAY MATAJI MANDIR MANGROLIYA PARIVAR TRUST- PITHVAJAL,AMRELI vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

ITA 845/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.844 & 845/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: N.A. Shree Satyay Mataji Mandir The Cit(Exemption), बनाम Mangroliya Parivar Trust-Pithvajal Ahmedabad Jisignpara Street No.2, Amreli, Vs. Gujarat-365601 Pan : Abits4939F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT-DR
Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iv)

section 12AB of the Act, on the ground that the object of the assessee- trust are restricted to the benefit of a particular religious community and caste and not for public at large. 3. Succinctly, the factual panorama of the case is that assessee before us is a charitable-trust. The assessee has filed Form 10AB, u/s. 12A(1)(ac

SHREE AMRELI MODH VANIK COMMUNITY PROPERTY,AMRELI vs. THE CIT-(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the grounds raised by the assessee are found devoid of merits and the same is hereby rejected

ITA 141/RJT/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Granting Registration. The Assessee Has Not Replied To The Above Notice, After Two Reminders, The Assessee Submitted The Details Stating That The Trust Is Maintaining & Providing Property Prominently Known As “Modh Mahajan Vadi” To The Modh Mahajan & Other Communities People On Various Occasions Of Marriage, Social Gathering, Social Events, Lecturers Etc., Along With Other Charitable Activities For General Benefits Of Community & Public At Large & Regularly Complying All The Provisions Of The Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, Including Filing Audit Reports & Giving Charity Contribution To The Charity Commissioner Regularly.

Section 12ASection 13(1)(b)Section 2(15)

ac will nor render the trust as not entitle for registration. 45(II) ITCL 57 Chennai ITAT. 4. Where original trust deed as well as copy thereof along with income and expenditure account is already furnished. The rejection of 12A application will not approve. 27 SOT 423 Delhi ITAT. I.T.A No. 141/Rjt/2019 A.Y. N.A. Page No 6 Amreli Modh Vanik

SHRI SAJISAVAI MOXDHAM SEVA TRUST ,SAVARKUNDLA, DIST. AMRELI vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 848/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Aug 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 848 & 849/Rjt/2024 Shri Sajisavai Moxdham Seva Vs. The Cit (Exemption), Trust-Amreli, Savarkundla, Ahmedabad Amreli "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abbts9964K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

ac)(iii) of the Act. “(1) The objects of the trust are not restricted only Sajisavai Sampraday but it is also for general public at large (Paperbook pages 30-62). At the beginning of the objects, it has been specifically mentioned that the trust will act without discrimination of caste (Paperbook Page 30, 41). Thus, it is patent on plain

SHRI SAJISAVAI MOXDHAM SEVA TRUST ,SAVARKUNDLA, DIST. AMRELI vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 849/RJT/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Aug 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 848 & 849/Rjt/2024 Shri Sajisavai Moxdham Seva Vs. The Cit (Exemption), Trust-Amreli, Savarkundla, Ahmedabad Amreli "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abbts9964K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

ac)(iii) of the Act. “(1) The objects of the trust are not restricted only Sajisavai Sampraday but it is also for general public at large (Paperbook pages 30-62). At the beginning of the objects, it has been specifically mentioned that the trust will act without discrimination of caste (Paperbook Page 30, 41). Thus, it is patent on plain

JAIN SANGHATANA FOUNDATION-JAMNAGAR,JAMNAGAR vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 359/RJT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Oct 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 359/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2025-26) Jain Sanghatana Foundation -Jamnagar, Cit (Exemption), Ahmedabad Vs. 15 Sidhbath Complex, K V Road, Aayakar Bhawan, Anandnagar- Jamnagar - 361001 Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad - 380015 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aajaj8198C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Sr. (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 07/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 03/10/2025

For Appellant: Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Sr. (DR)
Section 6Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

ac) (iii) of the act, the copy of the also certificate, placed on record. The Trust has applied for Provisional Registration under section 80G(5)(iv) of the Act vide Form 10A dated 29.03.2023. The copy of Form 10A along with the copy of the Provisional Registration granted in the Form 10AC is placed on record. The Trust has applied