BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 115clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka446Delhi188Chennai131Mumbai117Hyderabad68Bangalore68Jaipur29Chandigarh19Pune18Ahmedabad17Allahabad17Calcutta16Indore13Visakhapatnam11Lucknow10Rajkot7Kolkata7Agra6Jodhpur5Telangana5Amritsar5Nagpur4SC4Panaji2Rajasthan2Patna2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Cuttack1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 12A14Section 80G(5)10Section 14810Section 80G7Exemption7Section 143(1)6Section 115Section 80G(5)(iii)4Section 1474

SHRI UMIYA MATAJI ISHVER RAMJI ANNAKSHETRA TRUST,BHUJ KUTCH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose, in above terms

ITA 116/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.116/Rjt/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year: N.A. Shri Umiya Mataji Ishver Ramji Commissioner Of Income- बनाम Annakshetra Trust Tax(Exemption), Ahmedabad, Vadhay At Deshalpar Vandhay Room No.609, 6Th Floor, Vs. Taluka Bhuj Kutch-370 001 Ayakar Bhawan (Vejalpur), Pan : Aabts 8429 C Nr. Sacin Tower 100 Ft Road, Anandnagar Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad-3800 015 (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

section 80G(5) of the Act to have only charitable objects. Therefore, objects of the trust themselves cannot be wholly and substantially religious in nature. The objects of the trust should be wholly or substantially charitable in nature. Therefor Ld. CIT-DR submitted that assessee’s application Shri Umiya Mataji Ishver Ramji Annakshetra Trust 8 for approval u/s.80G

Charitable Trust2
Penalty2
Reopening of Assessment2

SHRI TUNDA JAIN MAHAJANWADI,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

ITA 358/RJT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jun 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.358/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: N.A.) Shri Tunda Jain Mahajanwadi, Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Tunda, Mundra, Kutch, Gujarat- Ahmedabad 370435 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abfts8536F (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT DR
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 5Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable purpose. Therefore, learned CIT(E) noted that the assessee has violated the above referred provisions of the Income Tax Act and hence the assessee is not entitled to get approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, therefore the assessee`s application filed in Form 10AB was rejected by ld.CIT(E ). 6. Aggrieved by the order

ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF INDUBHAI PAREKH SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE - RAJKOT,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 940/RJT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Jun 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 940/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (N.A.) (Hybrid Hearing) Alumni Associa"On Of Indubhai Parekh School Vs. The Cit(Exemp"On), Ahmedabad Of Architecture, Rajkot- 360005, Gujarat India "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aahta9691E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Kamal Bhambhani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Pungalia, Sr.D.R
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable activities, hence entitled to grant registration u/s. 12A. Hence it is submitted before us that if assessee given an opportunity to furnish all requisite documents before the CIT(E), so as to enable him to grant the necessary registration u/s. 12A of the Act. That the assessee trust could not comply with the notice issued

SHRI LEUVA PATEL KELAVANI MANDAL,JETPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, for statistical purposes

ITA 138/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Nov 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.138/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2022-23) Shri Leuva Patel Kelavani Mandal Vs. Cit(Exemption), Room No.609, 6Th Floor, Aayakar 01, Shri Leuva Patel Kelavni, Jetpur (Guj) -360370, Bhavan, Nr. Sachin Tower, 100Ft Road, Anandnagar-Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad-380015 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aants5027Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Sumit Shingala, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) : 08/10/2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement : 04/11/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per, Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Shingala, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13

Charitable or religious trust-Registration of (Denial of registration) - Assessee trust filed an application for grant of registration under section 12AB - Commissioner (Exemption) rejected same on ground that objects of trust were restricted to benefit of a particular religious community or caste, i.e., 'Leuva Patel' community - Tribunal held that provisions of section 13 could be invoked only at time

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 612/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

115 taxmann.com 289) (Madras)  Smt. Smriti Kedia v. UOI [2012] (20 taxmann.com 426) (Calcutta) 6. Therefore, the impugned assessment order passed without fulfilling the jurisdictional compliances is vague and bad-in-law. e) The approval accorded by the designated authority is mechanical and without independent application of mind. 1. The assessment in the case of appellant trust has been reopened

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 611/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

115 taxmann.com 289) (Madras)  Smt. Smriti Kedia v. UOI [2012] (20 taxmann.com 426) (Calcutta) 6. Therefore, the impugned assessment order passed without fulfilling the jurisdictional compliances is vague and bad-in-law. e) The approval accorded by the designated authority is mechanical and without independent application of mind. 1. The assessment in the case of appellant trust has been reopened

SHRI JAIN SWETAMBER MURTIPUJAK TAPGACHCHH SANGHA,DHORAJI, DIST. RAJKOT vs. THE NFAC (APPEALS) DELHI, DELHI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 168/RJT/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot14 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Sanghvi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 12Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 288

charitable or religious purposes or in part only for such purposes, or of income being voluntary contributions referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section 2, shall, if the total income in A.Y. 2011-12 3 respect of which he is assessable as a representative assessee (the total income for this purpose being computed under this