CHINTAN DWARKADAS CHOTAI,JUNAGADH vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR 1(1), RKT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee, is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

trust. This shows that Assessment was carried out in mechanical manner without appreciation of facts. 3. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the appellants case, the Ld. Assessing Officer of the National Faceless Penalty Centre has grossly erred by initiating penalty proceedings u/s 270A r.w.s 274 of the Act and alleging that the Appellant has underreported

PATEL KELAVANI MANDAL,TAPOVAN SHAIKSHNIK SANKUL vs. THE ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD - 2, RAJKOT, AAYAKAR BHAVAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Diesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 278/Rjt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2010-11) (Hybrid Hearing) Patel Kelavani Mandal, Junagadh. Vs. The Ito (E), Ward – 2, Tapovan Shaikshnik Sankul, Aaykar Bhavan, Bilkha Road, Race Course Ring Road, Junagadh - 362001 Rajkot - 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabtp7542H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Charitable Trust, is running different types of educational institutions. The assessee has been registered u/s.12AA of the Act w.e.f. AY 2015-16. As such, for the impugned AY 2010-11, the assessee is not entitled to claim exemption of its income u/s.11, 12 and 13 of the Act. The assessee did not file its return of income for the impugned

SHRI SHANTILAL JAIN,,MUMBAI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2,, BHUJ

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1063/Rjt/2009 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2002-03) बनाम/ Shri Shantilal Jain, I.T.O, 41, Usha, Ward-2, Vs. 161, S.V.Road, Bhuj. Vile Parle(West) Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaepj8434B (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Vimal Desai, A.R ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. D.R सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 19/09/2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement 10/12/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed: The Captioned Appeal Has Been Filed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- Ii, Rajkot [Ld. Cit(A) In Short] Dated 02/09/2009, Arising In The Matter Of Assessment Order Passed Under S. 143(3) R.W.S 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As "The Act") Dated 29/12/2006 Relevant To Assessment Years (A.Y.) 2002-03. A.Y. 2002-03 The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Charitable Trust, Mumbai, 41, Usha, 161, SC Road, Ville Parle, (West), Mumbai. 10. Shivam Development Trust, I 1, Saptmesh Complex, Pareshwar Chowk, Bhuj, Kutchch. 3. However, the DRI found that the impugned group of persons was involved in diverting the imported rags clothes materials in the open market in contravention to the provisions of the notification bearing no. 7/2001 issued

DHYAN SWAMIBAPA TRUST,SENJALDHAM, TEHSIL : SAVARKUNDLA, DIST: AMRELI vs. THE ITO EXEMPTION, WARD-1, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.244/Rjt/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2015-16 Dhyan Swamibapa Trust, Ito Senjaldham, Vs. Ward-1(Exemption), Tehsil Saavarkundala Rajkot. Dist. Amreli-364515 C/O. Sanghavi & Company, Prasham, 4Th Floor, Kasturba Road, Nr. Bilkha Plaza, Rajkot-360001. Pan: Aaatd1598E

charitable trusts are permitted to accumulate up to 25 per cent of their income without complying with any formalities or condition and such accumulation is not included in the total income. Therefore, we uphold the order of the AAC as it is quite justified in law and the assessee would be entitled to accumulate 25 per cent of the total

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

penalty proceedings u/s 270A, 271A, 271B and 271F of the Act. 8. That, the Ld. AO has wrongly charged interest u/s 234A and 234B of the Act. 9. That, the findings of the Ld. AO are not justified and are bad-in-law. The appellant craves to add, amend, alter or delete any of the above grounds of appeal” Page

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

penalty proceedings u/s 270A, 271A, 271B and 271F of the Act. 8. That, the Ld. AO has wrongly charged interest u/s 234A and 234B of the Act. 9. That, the findings of the Ld. AO are not justified and are bad-in-law. The appellant craves to add, amend, alter or delete any of the above grounds of appeal” Page

ASSOCIATION OF CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER GUJ-W-201-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.731/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: (2023-24) (Hybrid Hearing)

penalties. 5. Conclusion The appellant is a bona fide mutual association engaged solely in serving its members without any profit motive or external business activity. Based on the principle of mutuality, supported by authoritative judicial precedents, we submit that the income generated from members contributions is not taxable under the Income Tax Act. We humbly request this Hon'ble Tribunal

ACIT, CIR-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. SHRI RAJKOT DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD, RAJKOT

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.188/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Assistant Commissioner Of Income- Vs. Rajkot District Co-Operative Bank Tax, Circle-1 (1), Rajkot Limited Room No.502, Aayakar Bhawan, Jilla Bankbhavan, Kasturba Road, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot- Opp: Chaudhary High School, 360001 Rajkot 360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaar0564K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld.Sr.Dr : 09/06 /2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement : 05/08 /2025

penalties and interest, as it may be perceived as an attempt to evade taxes. Conclusion For taxpayers to legitimately benefit from the deduction under Section 36(1)(viii), strict adherence to statutory requirements is non-negotiable. Claiming the deduction through the profit and loss account and separately disclosing eligible business profits are crucial steps in this process. These practices