BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 54Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh51Delhi16Mumbai10Pune8Bangalore7Chennai6Ahmedabad5Jaipur5Indore4Rajkot4Kolkata4Hyderabad3Visakhapatnam2Agra2Cuttack1Surat1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 54F11Section 2637Section 1475Section 143(3)3Section 54B3Section 1483Section 453Deduction3Section 139(1)2Exemption

M/S FLAMINGO HOTELS PVT. LTD.,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GANDHIDHAM., GANDHIDHAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed with the above directions

ITA 64/RJT/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Nov 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Ms.Suchitra Raghunath Kambleassessment Year : 2010-11 M/S.Flamingo Hotels P.Ltd. Ito, Ward-1 Plot No.416 Gandhidham. Ward-2B Adipur-Kutch.

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, ld.CIT-DR
Section 2(47)Section 250(6)Section 45

gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year shall, save as otherwise provided in sections 54, 54B, 54D, 54E, 54EA, 54EB, 54F, 54G

DUSHYANT BHARATBHAI MEHTA,RAJKOT vs. ITO WD-(2)(1)(2) , RAJKOT

2
Capital Gains2
Disallowance2

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 422/RJT/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 54Section 54BSection 54F

capital gain and thereby, disallowing claim of\nexemption u/s 54F of the Act made by the assessee.\n(2) The Learned CIT(A) has erred in upholding the finding of the assessing officer that\nclaim of deduction u/s 54F of the Act, in any case, is excessive by Rs. 14,84,766/-.\n(3). The Learned CIT(A) has erred

YASMEEN WASEEM PARMAR ,JAMNAGAR vs. THE PR. CIT , JAMNAGAR

ITA 194/RJT/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Feb 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Dr. A. L. Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.194/Rjt/2024 Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Hearing) Yasmeen Waseem Parmar, Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Bawa No Delo, Opp. Old Post Income Tax, Office, Nagarpara Main Road, Jamnagar O/S. Khambhaliya Gate, Jamnagar, Gujarat-361001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aijph3607F (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 50CSection 54B

gain computation considering the jantri value as sales consideration of Rs 50,63,325/- (@6.95% of 7,28,53,600) and after deducting indexed cost of purchase (Rs 35,19,278) and deduction u/s 54B of the Act (Rs 27,13,863) resulting in capital loss of Rs 11,69,816/-. Further it is seen that you have sold

PARAS MEHTA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD 2 (1) (2), RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 548/RJT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Brijesh Parekh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 54F

capital gain to that extent last year. Therefore, the net investment made was only Rs. 86,19,297/-. Thus, the claim of Rs. 1,01,04,063/- u/s 54F during the year is excessive to the externt of Rs 14,84,766/- (Rs. 1,01,04,063 – Rs. 86,19,297). Therefore, the assessing officer held that the assessee