BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai18Jaipur15Delhi15Hyderabad14Ahmedabad11Pune9Kolkata8Chennai7Rajkot5Cochin5Surat5Lucknow5Indore4Bangalore3SC2Visakhapatnam1Dehradun1Jodhpur1Patna1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 44A23Section 271B14Section 271A8Penalty5Business Income3Section 143(2)2Section 2742Section 1482

SHRI SACHIN MAROTRAO RANGARI,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT CIR-1, GANDHIDHAM, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, the grounds raised by the Assessee is allowed and the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 106/RJT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Sept 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Fenil Mehta, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr.D.R
Section 271BSection 44A

271B penalty not be levied. In response the assessee vide its reply dated 08.12.2018, invited the kind attention of the Assessing Officer to the CBDT Circular No. 6/2016 dated 29.02.2016 which clarified the tax payers to decide whether the gains or losses from sale of listed shares/securities should be treated as business income or as capital gain for tax purposes

SMT. ALKABEN S. DONGA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (4), RAJKOT

In the result, the appeals are allowed in favour of the Assessee

ITA 188/RJT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot14 Oct 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, D.R
Section 148Section 271BSection 44A

Capital Gains. Further the assessee is of the bonafide belief that the net result in the trading of shares, cash and commodity shall be considered as “turnover” as per the Guidance Note issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). Thus the total turnover from Derivatives, Equity Shares and Mutual Fund is Rs. 48,43,374/- which does

SMT. ALKABEN S. DONGA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (4), RAJKOT

In the result, the appeals are allowed in favour of the Assessee

ITA 189/RJT/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot14 Oct 2022AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, D.R
Section 148Section 271BSection 44A

Capital Gains. Further the assessee is of the bonafide belief that the net result in the trading of shares, cash and commodity shall be considered as “turnover” as per the Guidance Note issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). Thus the total turnover from Derivatives, Equity Shares and Mutual Fund is Rs. 48,43,374/- which does

ASHOK SHANKARNARAYAN HEBBAR,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),, JAMNAGAR

Appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 197/RJT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot15 Jul 2019AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 271ASection 274Section 44A

271B of the act. The assessee was show caused vide notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271A of the act on 22nd Feb, 2016 to explain why not the penalty u/s. 271A should be imposed. The assessee has not made any compliance. Therefore, the assessing officer has imposed penalty of Rs. 25,000/- as the assessee has failed to keep or maintain

ASHOK SHANKARNARAYAN HEBBAR,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),, JAMNAGAR

Appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 198/RJT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot15 Jul 2019AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 271ASection 274Section 44A

271B of the act. The assessee was show caused vide notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271A of the act on 22nd Feb, 2016 to explain why not the penalty u/s. 271A should be imposed. The assessee has not made any compliance. Therefore, the assessing officer has imposed penalty of Rs. 25,000/- as the assessee has failed to keep or maintain