BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 192clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi548Mumbai526Bangalore240Chennai202Kolkata152Karnataka106Ahmedabad94Hyderabad86Jaipur63Agra59Chandigarh52Calcutta50Cochin49Raipur47Guwahati35Cuttack33Pune32Amritsar23Nagpur23Lucknow23Indore21SC16Surat15Jodhpur7Visakhapatnam6Rajkot6Kerala5Telangana5Allahabad5Dehradun4Patna3Rajasthan3Varanasi2Orissa1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Ranchi1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 80I10Section 806Addition to Income5Section 1484Section 544Deduction4Section 143(3)3Section 1472Section 153A2Limitation/Time-bar

M/S CHANDRAKANT H. KAKKAD,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, this ground of the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 126/RJT/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Sept 2022AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Rindani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 54Section 54F

192 (SC). The same needs consideration. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and facts in confirming the income at Rs. 11,21,230/- as against return income of Rs. 97,838/- and there by endorsing addition of an amount of Rs. 10,23,392/-. The addition needs deletion. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred

2

PRATIBHABEN ASHOKKUMAR DAVE,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 20/RJT/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed Hon’Ble"नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2007-08 Pratibhaben Ashokumar Dave The Ito, Ward-3(1) Rajkot. “Shiv Urja”, 12-Bhaktinagar Society Vs. Dhebar Road Rajkot. (Applicant) (Responent)

For Appellant: Written submissionsFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Das, DR
Section 148Section 249Section 249(3)Section 3

192/-. The assessee did not disclose any capital gain arisen from such sales in the return. Therefore, the AO presumed that capital gain on such transaction has escaped assessment, and reopened assessment under section

SHRI JAWAHIR RAVICHANDRA MEHTA,DUBAI(UAE) vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result appeal of the assessee vide ITA/81/Rjt/2020 stands dismissed

ITA 81/RJT/2020[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Dec 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Memebr

Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 149(3)Section 4

capital gain shown and interest on NRO Account and added in the hands of the said Jawahir Mehta. Nowhere it is reflecting that the said assessments were made on protective basis on him. Be that as it may, if the assessment in the case of the father Ravichandra Mehta is made to be substantive in respect of the said sons

BACKBONE ENTERPRISE LTD.,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DY. COMMR. INCOME TAX, CEN. CIRCLE-II,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 128/RJT/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Sept 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Aarsi Prasad, CIT-D.R
Section 153ASection 80Section 80I

192, 193/Rjt/2011, 214/Rjt/2011 and 485/Rjt/2014 dated 03-12-2018 5. Welspun Projects Ltd. (Ahmedabad Tribunal) dated 08-10-2018 (2018) 54 CCH 0070 6. M/s BBEL STPL (JV) (Rajkot Tribunal) in ITA No. 507/Rjt/2012 dated 28.-10-2016 - A.Y. 2009-10 7. TARMAT - BEL (JV) (Rajkot Tribunal) in ITA No. 1111/RJT/2010 dated

THE ASSTT. COMMR. INCOME TAX, CEN. CIRCLE-2,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S BACKBONE ENTERPRISES LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 149/RJT/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Sept 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Aarsi Prasad, CIT-D.R
Section 153ASection 80Section 80I

192, 193/Rjt/2011, 214/Rjt/2011 and 485/Rjt/2014 dated 03-12-2018 5. Welspun Projects Ltd. (Ahmedabad Tribunal) dated 08-10-2018 (2018) 54 CCH 0070 6. M/s BBEL STPL (JV) (Rajkot Tribunal) in ITA No. 507/Rjt/2012 dated 28.-10-2016 - A.Y. 2009-10 7. TARMAT - BEL (JV) (Rajkot Tribunal) in ITA No. 1111/RJT/2010 dated

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2,, JAMNAGAR vs. M/S HIRAVATI MARINE PRODUCTS (P) LTD.,, PORBANDAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue and cross objection of the assessee both are dismissed

ITA 946/RJT/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot23 Sept 2019AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Shri P. M. Maharshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

capital asset and hence revenue in nature. Some of the advances are for the purposes of repairing work of machines etc, which has already been carried out but appropriate bills have not been received. But such advances written off cannot be allowed as they become as such prior period expenses. Appellant is in the business of fisheries. Appellant acquires fish