BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 142A(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi25Chandigarh12Jaipur11Kolkata7Nagpur7Bangalore7Raipur6Mumbai5Chennai5Lucknow5Indore4Hyderabad3Rajkot2Pune2Surat1Cochin1Cuttack1Jabalpur1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Section 143(2)2Section 50C2Section 1472Addition to Income2

KALINDI JAYENDRA RANPARA RAJKOT,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-2(1)(2), RAJKOT

ITA 125/RJT/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Mar 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.125/Rjt/2024 Assessment Year: (2006-07) (Hybrid Hearing) Kalindi Jayendra Ranpara. Vs. The Ito Ward-2(1)(2), Rajkot. Shrungar Jewellers, Soni Bazar Main Road, Rajkot-360001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abgpr6315Q (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 234Section 274Section 50C

6). Your assessee reserves the right in addition or alteration in the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing. 3. The relevant material facts, as culled out from the material on record, are as follows. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the Act and assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s

SMT. SHEETAL RASHMIN PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE I. T. O. WARD-2, GANDHIDHAM, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, for statistical\npurposes

ITA 182/RJT/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Sept 2025AY 2007-08
Section 142ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)

142A of the Act?\n2.Whether, on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. Assessing\nofficer has erred in making addition twice for some lottery income?\n3.Whether, on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. Assessing\nofficer has erred in making addition of Rs. 14,00,030/- for lottery received in\nkind?\n4.Whether, on facts