BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 112Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai34Pune9Bangalore8Delhi5Chennai3Indore3Rajkot2Surat1Ahmedabad1Dehradun1Jaipur1Kolkata1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 87A16Section 111A9Section 115B8Section 143(1)5Capital Gains2

PADMABEN KANTILAL RANPARA,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1)(2) RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 516/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Sept 2025AY 2024-25
Section 111ASection 115BSection 143(1)Section 87A

capital gains.\n5.11 The absence of a corresponding clause in section 111A is legally significant and\nsupports the principle that – when the legislature intended to deny rebate in respect of\nspecial income (as in section 112A

MANOJBHAI C. KAMDAR,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , INCOME TAX OFFICE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 572/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot
03 Nov 2025
AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.572/Rjt/2025 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2024-25) Manojbhai C. Kamdar, Vs. Ito, Ward-1(1)(1), A-47, Aalap Green City, Raiya Aayakar Bhavan, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot (Gujarat) - 360007 Road, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adgpk8679J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri R. D. Lalchandani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Shri R. D. Lalchandani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 111ASection 115BSection 143(1)Section 250Section 87A

capital gains. 5.11 The absence of a corresponding clause in section 111A is legally significant and supports the principle that – when the legislature intended to deny rebate in respect of special income (as in section 112A