BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 272A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad7Mumbai6Delhi5Chandigarh5Jaipur3Rajkot2Dehradun1Cuttack1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7Section 69C4Section 234A2Penalty2Addition to Income2Natural Justice2

PRASHANT ARVINDBHAI LOLARIYA ,RAJKOT vs. FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT, FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT

ITA 906/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Feb 2025AY 2021-22
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 69C

section 143(3) r.w.s. 1448 of the Income Tax Act.\n1961 is bad on facts as well as in law.\n2. The Ld. A.O. erred on facts as well as in law in making assessment in violation\nof the principal of natural justice, therefore the impugned order is bad on facts as\nwell as in law and thereby

PRASHANT ARVINDBHAI LOLARIYA ,RAJKOT vs. FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT, FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT

ITA 907/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Feb 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 906 & 907 /Rjt/ 2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2021-22) (Hybrid Hearing) Prashant Arvindbhai Lolariya Vs. The Ito, Ward 2(1)(1), C/O. K. P. Parekh & Co. Office No. Aayakar Bhawan, Race Course 113-114, J.P. Towers, Tagor Road, Ring Road, Nr. Bhakti Nagar Station Plot Rajkot - 360001 Rajkot – 360002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aampl3851E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Viraj Kapuria, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 28 / 01 /2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04 / 02 /2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Viraj Kapuria, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 69C

section 143(3) r.w.s. 1448 of the Income Tax Act. 1961 is bad on facts as well as in law. 2. The Ld. A.O. erred on facts as well as in law in making assessment in violation of the principal of natural justice, therefore the impugned order is bad on facts as well as in law and thereby