BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 234Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai173Delhi116Bangalore51Jaipur24Allahabad21Ahmedabad20Agra15Kolkata13Hyderabad12Chandigarh9Indore8Surat7Lucknow6Raipur6Rajkot5Jodhpur4Chennai3Nagpur3Dehradun2Pune1Ranchi1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 1478Section 115B8Section 143(3)7Section 234A7Penalty5Addition to Income5Section 69C4Section 684Section 1544Section 250

PRASHANT ARVINDBHAI LOLARIYA ,RAJKOT vs. FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT, FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT

ITA 906/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Feb 2025AY 2021-22
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 69C

purchases, invoking provisions of sec. 69C of\nthe Act.\n7. The Ld. A.O. has erred on facts as well as in law by charging tax as per sec\n115BBE of the Act in respect of the addition made for profit embedded in unverified\npurchases.\n8. The learned A.O. erred in charging interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C

PRASHANT ARVINDBHAI LOLARIYA ,RAJKOT vs. FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT, FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT

ITA 907/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Feb 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 906 & 907 /Rjt/ 2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2021-22) (Hybrid Hearing) Prashant Arvindbhai Lolariya Vs. The Ito, Ward 2(1)(1), C/O. K. P. Parekh & Co. Office No. Aayakar Bhawan, Race Course 113-114, J.P. Towers, Tagor Road, Ring Road, Nr. Bhakti Nagar Station Plot Rajkot - 360001 Rajkot – 360002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aampl3851E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Viraj Kapuria, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 28 / 01 /2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04 / 02 /2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm:

3
Natural Justice2
Rectification u/s 1542
For Appellant: Shri Viraj Kapuria, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 69C

section 143(3) r.w.s. 1448 of the Income Tax Act. 1961 is bad on facts as well as in law. 2. The Ld. A.O. erred on facts as well as in law in making assessment in violation of the principal of natural justice, therefore the impugned order is bad on facts as well as in law and thereby

PARI ANIL GANDHI,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1)(1) RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, both the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 896/RJT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot05 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 896 & 897/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Hybrid Hearing) Pari Anil Gandhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(1), C-702 Sadguru Vatika, Airport Road, 2- Aayakar Bhavan Race Course Ring Maruti Nagar, Rajkot - 360001 Road, Rajkot - 360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bahpg7804E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 09 / 10 /2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 05 / 01 /2026 आदेश/Order Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm; Captioned Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2013-14, Is Directed Against Order Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Dated 22/11/2024, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 147 Read With Section 144B Of The I.T. Act, On Dated 28/03/2022. 2. Since, The Issues Involved All These Appeals Are Common & Identical; Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & A Consolidated Order Are Being Passed For The Sake Of Convenience, We Shall Take The Lead Case In Ita No.896/Rjt/2024 For Assessment Year 2013-14. Ita No. 896&897/Rjt/2024 Pari Anil Gandhi Rajkot

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav Ld. SR. DR
Section 115BSection 144BSection 147Section 154Section 234Section 234ASection 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

234B of the act for the period of 108 months (01.04.2013 to 31.03.2022) which works out ITA No. 896&897/Rjt/2024 Pari Anil Gandhi Rajkot to Rs.5.53,338/- u/s.234B and interest u/s.234A 15 worked out at Rs.5,225/- and thus aggregate revenue effect comes to Rs.10,70,913/- hence total demand raised Rs.32,12,392/- it is totally wrong, unwarranted, unjustified

PARI ANIL GANDHI,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, both the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 897/RJT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot05 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 896 & 897/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Hybrid Hearing) Pari Anil Gandhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(1), C-702 Sadguru Vatika, Airport Road, 2- Aayakar Bhavan Race Course Ring Maruti Nagar, Rajkot - 360001 Road, Rajkot - 360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bahpg7804E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 09 / 10 /2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 05 / 01 /2026 आदेश/Order Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm; Captioned Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2013-14, Is Directed Against Order Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Dated 22/11/2024, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 147 Read With Section 144B Of The I.T. Act, On Dated 28/03/2022. 2. Since, The Issues Involved All These Appeals Are Common & Identical; Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & A Consolidated Order Are Being Passed For The Sake Of Convenience, We Shall Take The Lead Case In Ita No.896/Rjt/2024 For Assessment Year 2013-14. Ita No. 896&897/Rjt/2024 Pari Anil Gandhi Rajkot

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav Ld. SR. DR
Section 115BSection 144BSection 147Section 154Section 234Section 234ASection 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

234B of the act for the period of 108 months (01.04.2013 to 31.03.2022) which works out ITA No. 896&897/Rjt/2024 Pari Anil Gandhi Rajkot to Rs.5.53,338/- u/s.234B and interest u/s.234A 15 worked out at Rs.5,225/- and thus aggregate revenue effect comes to Rs.10,70,913/- hence total demand raised Rs.32,12,392/- it is totally wrong, unwarranted, unjustified

URVASHI GIRISHBHAI LAL,RAJKOT vs. ITO WD 1(2)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 466/RJT/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows: “1. That, the Ld. CIT(A) has wrongly confirmed the reopening of assessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the I.T. Act, 1961. Urvashi Girishbhai Lal, 2. That, the Ld. CIT(A) has wrongly confirmed the addition amounting