BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 14Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai476Delhi199Kolkata103Karnataka99Ahmedabad74Chennai46Amritsar34Jaipur32Pune31Indore21Raipur20Bangalore18Visakhapatnam13Lucknow7Surat6Rajkot5Cuttack3Chandigarh3Hyderabad3Panaji3Nagpur2Dehradun2Orissa2Ranchi1Patna1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Disallowance5Section 40A(3)4Section 2634Deduction4Natural Justice4

M/S RADHE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD.,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMR. INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 139/RJT/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CIT. D.RFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus transactions is not sustainable. Accordingly, we direct the AO to delete the same. It is not out of the place to mention that learned 19 A.Y.2011-12 and others CIT-A has deleted the addition made by the AO after elaborate discussion which has been reproduced somewhere in the preceding paragraph. The learned DR at the time of hearing

THE DEPUTY COMMR. INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(2),, RAJKOT vs. M/S RADHE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 322/RJT/2017[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CIT. D.RFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus transactions is not sustainable. Accordingly, we direct the AO to delete the same. It is not out of the place to mention that learned 19 A.Y.2011-12 and others CIT-A has deleted the addition made by the AO after elaborate discussion which has been reproduced somewhere in the preceding paragraph. The learned DR at the time of hearing

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. RADHE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPEMENT PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 156/RJT/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CIT. D.RFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus transactions is not sustainable. Accordingly, we direct the AO to delete the same. It is not out of the place to mention that learned 19 A.Y.2011-12 and others CIT-A has deleted the addition made by the AO after elaborate discussion which has been reproduced somewhere in the preceding paragraph. The learned DR at the time of hearing

RADHE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD,RAJKOT vs. THE PCIT, RAJKOT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 110/RJT/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CIT. D.RFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus transactions is not sustainable. Accordingly, we direct the AO to delete the same. It is not out of the place to mention that learned 19 A.Y.2011-12 and others CIT-A has deleted the addition made by the AO after elaborate discussion which has been reproduced somewhere in the preceding paragraph. The learned DR at the time of hearing

M/S MGM TRADELINK PVT. LTD.,,GANDHIDHAM vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 974/RJT/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot12 Mar 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 974/Rjt/2010 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2005-2006

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 40A(3)

14A(3) of the Act. The 'Ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming the same. 3. The ''Ld.AO has erred in law as well as on facts in making disallowance of Rs.12,67,684/- on account of inflation in purchase price. The ''Ld.CIT(A) has erred in disallowed entire purchasing of Rs1,26,76,848/- thus enhancing the disallowance the disallowance