Search: bogus purchases

10 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 138clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14818 Addition to Income10 Section 1479 Section 271A9 Section 69A9 Section 148A9 Section 143(2)9 Section 142(1)9 Penalty9 Reopening of Assessment

M/S. R M TRADELINK,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 68/RJT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot16 Sept 2022AY 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Rindani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CIT-D.R

Section 143(3)Section 206CSection 263Section 40Section 69C

bogus purchases and made addition of " 76,86,510/- disallowing 30% of the purchase of " 2,53,99,953/- since no TCS was collected on the same. However, as per the Principal CIT, the entire purchase amounting to " 2,53,99,953/- should have been treated as un-expenditure in the nature of unverifiable purchases and the total amount

M/S. R M TRADELINK,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

M/S. R M TRADELINK,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

VALLABHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI KATHIRIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(10) JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR