SHILPA ROHIT THAKKAR,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT
In the result, the appeal raised by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 403/RJT/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Feb 2019AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.403/Rjt/2013 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 009-10) Smt.Shilpa Rohit Thakkar The Income Tax बनाम/ 702, Guruprasad Appt. Officer Vs. B/H. Shiv Ice Cream Ward-3(4) Race Course Ring Road Rajkot Rajkot "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpt 2819 H .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Vimal Desai, Ar ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.Dr
For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 24Section 54F
4. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee in an individual and deriving her (assessee) income under the head ‘salary’, capital gain, and other sources. The Assessing Officer during the assessment proceedings found that the assessee has received rental income from DHL Express
(India) Pvt.Ltd. amounting to Rs.2,00,000/- which was not disclosed in the income-tax return
