SHILPA ROHIT THAKKAR,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT
In the result, the appeal raised by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 403/RJT/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Feb 2019AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.403/Rjt/2013 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 009-10) Smt.Shilpa Rohit Thakkar The Income Tax बनाम/ 702, Guruprasad Appt. Officer Vs. B/H. Shiv Ice Cream Ward-3(4) Race Course Ring Road Rajkot Rajkot "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpt 2819 H .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Vimal Desai, Ar ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.Dr
For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 24Section 54F
TDS deducted by DHL Express (India) Pvt. Ltd regarding the rent paid to her.
8. The Ld. DR vehemently supported the orders of the authorities below.
9. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the materials available on record. As per Form 26AS, the assessee has received the rent of ₹2 lakhs from DHL express (India) Private
