BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 240clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai329Delhi296Chennai188Bangalore166Karnataka84Hyderabad72Kolkata58Ahmedabad54Raipur46Jaipur45Pune43Chandigarh34Nagpur21Indore19Lucknow18Cuttack16Surat12Cochin10Visakhapatnam9Guwahati6Patna6Dehradun6Ranchi6Panaji5Jabalpur3Rajkot2SC2Telangana2Amritsar1Calcutta1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 89(1)4Section 143(1)2Section 1542Section 142(1)2

SMT. DINUMATIBEN DAMJIBHAI SHILU,RAJKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2 (2) (5), RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 195/RJT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), SMT. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri B.D.Gupta, Ld.Sr.DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250(6)Section 80CSection 89(1)

sections 234A/B/C was included therein amounting to Rs.1,02,679/- resulting in aggregate tax liability raised on the assessee of Rs.9,80,342/-. The said intimation was made on 17.11.2014. Thereafter on 31.8.2018, the assessee filed rectification application before the AO stating that his income returned for tax had been wrongly returned by including therein exempt income to the extent

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(2),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. RAJKOT PEOPLES CO. OP. BANK LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed except CO of the assessee in the Asstt

ITA 415/RJT/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot16 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Rajpal Yadavsr.

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Hargovind Singh, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)

240/- 6. 2013-14 6,51,72,778/- 11. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. We find that the issue in dispute is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court ITA No.36/RJT/2014 and 8 Others With CO Ms/.Cooperative Bank of Rajkot Vs. ACIT