RAKESH BASANTILAL LADDHA,,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr.

TDS statement under Section 200A of the Act. Thus, according to the petitioner, no fine could be levied under Section 234E of the Act. This contention of the assessee was rejected by the Hon’ble High Court and it was held that fine can be levied independently under Section 234E of the Act, because Hon’ble Court

PARAG MAKANBHAI PARSANA,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr.

TDS statement under Section 200A of the Act. Thus, according to the petitioner, no fine could be levied under Section 234E of the Act. This contention of the assessee was rejected by the Hon’ble High Court and it was held that fine can be levied independently under Section 234E of the Act, because Hon’ble Court

SHRI NIRMAL RAJENDRA JAGETIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. THE ITO (TDS-3), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

TDS [ITA. No.\n1092/Mds/2015]\nWe have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant\nmaterial on record. Section 200A of the Act provides for processing of the statement of\nTDS by making adjustment as provided in that Section. For the purpose of convenience,\nwe are reproducing the provisions of Section 200A:\n\"200A (1) Where a statement

SHREE DEEPKALA PROCESSORS,JETPUR vs. THE ACIT(CPC) TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

TDS 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:- “1) WE LEARNED DEPARTMENT HAS ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THERE IS SHORT PAYMENT OF 41,543 AND WRONGLY RAISED THE DEMAND WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFICATION AND CLARIFICATION. 2) HE LEARNED DEPARTMENT HAS ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THERE IS INTERST 9292.50 AND WRONGLY RAISED THE DEMAND WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFICATION AND CLARIFICATION

CREATIVE FORGE PVT. LTD. ,VERAVAL(SHAPAR), RAJKOT vs. THE D/ACIT, TDS-CPC,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

TDS CPC, Rajkot 257, Veraval (Shapar), Vs (Respondent) Tal Kotda Sangani, Rajkot PAN: AACCC4069N/RKTC0069 7E (Appellant) Revenue by: Shri S.S. Rathi, Sr. D.R. Assessee by: Withdrawal Application Date of hearing : 25-08-2021 Date of pronouncement : 27-08-2021 आदेश/ORDER PER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2017-18, arises from order

VIDHYOTEJAK SAMAJ,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, these five appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.703-707/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: (2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 To 2013-14) Vidhyotejak Samaj बनाम/ Act, Cpc, Tds, H.B. Jasani Vidya Bhavan, Ghaziabad Vs. Chhelbhai Dave Marg, Vidhyanagar, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatv 1358 G (अपीलाथ" /Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By :Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Senior-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 22/07/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/07/2025

200A(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for assessment years (AYs) 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. Since the issues involved in all these appeals are common and 2. identical; therefore, these appeals of the assessee have been clubbed and heard together, and a consolidated order

VIDHYOTEJAK SAMAJ,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, these five appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.703-707/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: (2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 To 2013-14) Vidhyotejak Samaj बनाम/ Act, Cpc, Tds, H.B. Jasani Vidya Bhavan, Ghaziabad Vs. Chhelbhai Dave Marg, Vidhyanagar, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatv 1358 G (अपीलाथ" /Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By :Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Senior-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 22/07/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/07/2025

200A(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for assessment years (AYs) 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. Since the issues involved in all these appeals are common and 2. identical; therefore, these appeals of the assessee have been clubbed and heard together, and a consolidated order

VIDHYOTEJAK SAMAJ,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, these five appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.703-707/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: (2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 To 2013-14) Vidhyotejak Samaj बनाम/ Act, Cpc, Tds, H.B. Jasani Vidya Bhavan, Ghaziabad Vs. Chhelbhai Dave Marg, Vidhyanagar, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatv 1358 G (अपीलाथ" /Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By :Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Senior-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 22/07/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/07/2025

200A(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for assessment years (AYs) 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. Since the issues involved in all these appeals are common and 2. identical; therefore, these appeals of the assessee have been clubbed and heard together, and a consolidated order

VIDHYOTEJAK SAMAJ,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, these five appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.703-707/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: (2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 To 2013-14) Vidhyotejak Samaj बनाम/ Act, Cpc, Tds, H.B. Jasani Vidya Bhavan, Ghaziabad Vs. Chhelbhai Dave Marg, Vidhyanagar, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatv 1358 G (अपीलाथ" /Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By :Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Senior-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 22/07/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/07/2025

200A(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for assessment years (AYs) 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. Since the issues involved in all these appeals are common and 2. identical; therefore, these appeals of the assessee have been clubbed and heard together, and a consolidated order

VIDHYOTEJAK SAMAJ,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, these five appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.703-707/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: (2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 To 2013-14) Vidhyotejak Samaj बनाम/ Act, Cpc, Tds, H.B. Jasani Vidya Bhavan, Ghaziabad Vs. Chhelbhai Dave Marg, Vidhyanagar, Rajkot-360 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatv 1358 G (अपीलाथ" /Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By :Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Senior-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 22/07/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/07/2025

200A(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for assessment years (AYs) 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. Since the issues involved in all these appeals are common and 2. identical; therefore, these appeals of the assessee have been clubbed and heard together, and a consolidated order

NIRAJ TRANSPOZAL,JAMNAGAR vs. THE CIT (APPEALS), JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee are dismissed under VSV

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 142-144/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2016-2017 Niraj Transpozal, A.C.I.T., Indraprastha Complex, Vs. Centralized Processing Bedi Gate, Cell(Tds), Jamnagar. Ghaziabad.

200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2016-17. ITA nos.142-144/Rjt/2020 A.Y. 2016-17 2 2. When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. AR for the assessee submitted that the liability imposed by the Revenue under the provisions of section 234E

NIRAJ TRANSPOZAL,JAMNAGAR vs. THE CIT(APPEALS), JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee are dismissed under VSV

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 142-144/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2016-2017 Niraj Transpozal, A.C.I.T., Indraprastha Complex, Vs. Centralized Processing Bedi Gate, Cell(Tds), Jamnagar. Ghaziabad.

200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2016-17. ITA nos.142-144/Rjt/2020 A.Y. 2016-17 2 2. When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. AR for the assessee submitted that the liability imposed by the Revenue under the provisions of section 234E

NIRAJ TRANSPOZAL,JAMNAGAR vs. THE CIT(APPEALS), JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee are dismissed under VSV

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 142-144/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2016-2017 Niraj Transpozal, A.C.I.T., Indraprastha Complex, Vs. Centralized Processing Bedi Gate, Cell(Tds), Jamnagar. Ghaziabad.

200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2016-17. ITA nos.142-144/Rjt/2020 A.Y. 2016-17 2 2. When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. AR for the assessee submitted that the liability imposed by the Revenue under the provisions of section 234E