Search: TDS | BharatTax

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 186clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26312 Section 143(3)6 Section 1542 Revision u/s 2632 TDS2

M/S. HINDUSTAN MINMENT INC.,JAMNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2),, JAMNAGAR

In the result, appeal filed by Assessee is allowed

ITA 277/RJT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Aug 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Amarjit Singh) [Through Virtual Court]

For Appellant: Shri M. J. Ranpura, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S. S. Rathi, Sr. D.R

Section 139(1)Section 140ASection 154Section 194JSection 44A

186/-. 3. At the time of filing original return of income appellant had not claimed credit of TDS of Rs. 12,40,870/- deducted by the M/s. Aditya Coke Pvt. Ltd. as the same was not reflected in the statement of tax paid/deducted in the form no. 26AS. However, the said tax payment was duly reflected in book of account

M/S. HINDUSTAN MINMENT INC.,JAMNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2),, JAMNAGAR

M/S. HINDUSTAN MINMENT INC.,JAMNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2),, JAMNAGAR

JITENDRASINH ZALA,JAMNAGAR vs. THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMNAGAR

HOLLIS VITRIFIED PRIVATE LIMITED,MORBI, GUJARAT, INDIA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT, GUJARAT, INDIA