BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata27Delhi23Bangalore17Mumbai15Patna13Indore11Chennai10Lucknow9Nagpur5Rajkot3Jaipur3Chandigarh2Guwahati2Raipur2Ahmedabad2Pune2Cochin1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 12A4Section 143(3)4Section 1443Addition to Income3Section 143(2)2Section 69A2Section 115B2Exemption2Deduction

ADHYAKSHYA LOK MELA AMLIKARAN SAMMITTEE,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, RAJKOT

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 283/RJT/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot05 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 283 & 284/Rjt/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Adhyakshya Lok Mela Amlikaran Ito (Exemption) Sammittee Vs Ward-1, Rajkot. C/O. A.D.Vyas & Co. Kotecha Nagar Main Road Opp: Kotechha Girls High School Rajkot 360 001. अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Smt.Ashaben Vyas, Ad Revenue By : Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Smt.Ashaben Vyas, ADFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.DR
Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS from its income. Therefore, the assessment order passed under section 143(3) on 28.11.2011 for Assessment Year 2009-10 is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. By the powers vested in CIT-I, Rajkot u/s. 263 of the I T Act, the Assessing Officer is directed to enhance the total income of the assessee by Rs.1

2
TDS2

ADHYAKSHYA LOK MELA AMLIKARAN SAMMITTEE,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, RAJKOT

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 284/RJT/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot05 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 283 & 284/Rjt/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Adhyakshya Lok Mela Amlikaran Ito (Exemption) Sammittee Vs Ward-1, Rajkot. C/O. A.D.Vyas & Co. Kotecha Nagar Main Road Opp: Kotechha Girls High School Rajkot 360 001. अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Smt.Ashaben Vyas, Ad Revenue By : Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Smt.Ashaben Vyas, ADFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.DR
Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS from its income. Therefore, the assessment order passed under section 143(3) on 28.11.2011 for Assessment Year 2009-10 is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. By the powers vested in CIT-I, Rajkot u/s. 263 of the I T Act, the Assessing Officer is directed to enhance the total income of the assessee by Rs.1

SHRI HARILAL LAXMIDAS VAISHNANI,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT/DCIT(INT. TAXN.), RAJKOT

In the result, in view of the discussion above and the facts placed on record before us, we are hereby allowing the appeal of the assessee

ITA 141/RJT/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot14 Dec 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 115BSection 144Section 234ASection 274Section 69Section 69A

144A, I do not find any infirmity as the AC) has followed the due process of law under the Income Tax Act and that adequate opportunities were provided to the assessee by way of various statutory notices and also final show causes on the issues which have been added by the AO towards determination of total income. It is also