ASHOK HIRPARA, DEPUTY COMMIOSSIONER OF INCOMETAX, JAMNAGAR vs. SANJAY GULABRAI KUNDALIA, JAMNAGAR
In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and cross objection filed by the assessee is also dismissed
ITA 66/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot18 Sept 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /.Ita No.66/Rjt/2025 & C.O. No. 10/Rjt/2025 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2016-17 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Sanjay Gulabrai Kundalia बनाम Tax, Jamnagar Khambhaliya Circle-1, Vs. Highway, Sikkarpatiya, Jamnagar Sikka, Jamnagar Pan: Acypk3888Q Sanjay Gulabrai Kundalia Jamnagar Khambhaliya Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Highway, Sikkarpatiya, Circle-1, Jamnagar Sikka, Jamnagar Pan: Acypk3888Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant/Respondent) : (""यथ"/Respondent/Cross Objector) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri K.D. Sheth, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 30/06/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18/09/2025 Order Per: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Revenue & Cross Objection Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2016-17, Are Directed Against The Common Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [In Short ‘Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac’], Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’), Dated 10.12.2024, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Dcit Vs.Sanjay Gulabrai Kundalia
For Appellant: Shri K.D. Sheth, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250
100% addition, however the Ld. CIT(A) restricted the addition of 20% of the expenditure, without going into merits of the case. The Assessing Officer has passed a reasoned and speaking order. The assessee has given the address of these parties of Mumbai whereas the fact is that all these partes are residing at Jamnagar. Further, the onus