ANKUL CONSTRUCTION CO.,RAJKOT vs. THE ASSIT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX , CPC BENGLURU/ITO WD-1(2)(1), RAJKOT
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms
ITA 484/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot17 Feb 2025AY 2020-21
Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita No. 484/Rjt/2024 Assessment Year: (2020-21) (Hybrid Hearing) Anukul Constriction Co. Vs. Asstt. Director Of Income 901, Aalap-B, Opp. Shastri Ground, Tax, Cpc Bangaluru / Ito Limda Chowk, Ward 1(2)(1), Rajkot – 360001 Aayakar Bhavan, Rajkot - 360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aakfa2385E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Jay Kathrani, Ld. A.R. Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 04/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 17/02/2025
For Appellant: Shri Jay Kathrani, Ld. A.RFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139Section 143(1)Section 154Section 154(3)Section 28Section 28(1)Section 30Section 38Section 40Section 40a
rectification u/s. 154 of the Act, and the application was rejected by the Ld. ADIT/ CPC, Bengaluru.
5. That the assessee filed an appeal against the impugned order dated 22.08.2022
and rectified the order.
“In view of the above, I find no infirmity in the disallowance made by the CPC u/s.
40a(ia) for non-compliance of TDS