BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 173clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi748Mumbai473Karnataka471Bangalore138Chennai126Kolkata91Jaipur88Ahmedabad88Surat66Chandigarh53Hyderabad45Raipur43Indore34Ranchi32Lucknow29Patna24Allahabad24Calcutta19SC18Visakhapatnam18Amritsar17Telangana16Rajkot15Agra13Cochin12Pune10Guwahati8Dehradun7Rajasthan6Jodhpur5Nagpur4Varanasi4Panaji2Jabalpur2Cuttack2Uttarakhand2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 172Addition to Income2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, vs. MS. HARSHITA MAHESHWARI,

ITA/94/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since

M/S FINGROWTH COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/9/2020HC Rajasthan24 Aug 2023

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,SAMEER JAIN

Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JAIPUR-II vs. M/S VAIBHAV GLOBAL LTD

The appeal is allowed in part

ITA/291/2017HC Rajasthan24 Jan 2022

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,SAMEER JAIN

Section 166Section 173

173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “ MV Act”) has been filed challenging the award dated 27.10.2016 passed by 4th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur (CG) in Claim Case No.523/2015. By the impugned award, the learned tribunal has awarded Rs.15,72,360/- as compensation to the appellants/claimants with 9% interest per 2 annum on account of death

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SHRI ASHOK AGARWAL HUF

ITA/4/2021HC Rajasthan16 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

Section 120BSection 13(1)(d)Section 13(2)Section 17Section 26Section 42

173(5) Cr.PC. PMLA does not define "complaint" but "complaint is defined under Section 2(4) CrPC as allegation made orally or written to be Magistrate for taking action against the persons who have committed the offence. 25. PMLA is a Special Act. The provisions of the said Act are mandatory. They have to be applied as it. Being

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

Section 3 of the 1976 Act. The statement of objects and reasons disclosed that the purpose of the 1976 Act was to undo the settlements which had been arrived at between the Corporation and Class III and Class IV employees (the validity of which had been recognised by the order of the learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.

ITA/82/2020HC Rajasthan14 Feb 2022

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,SUDESH BANSAL

Sections 2(h), 2(j), 2(n), 2(t), 2(u) & 2(x). It is argued that in terms of the said provisions information of Registrants would be clearly covered and thus would have to be protected from disclosure. The said sections are extracted hereinunder for ease of reference: “2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires