BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 54clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,502Mumbai1,433Chennai418Bangalore403Jaipur346Ahmedabad281Kolkata233Hyderabad198Chandigarh174Pune142Indore109Raipur99Amritsar91Surat83Cochin68Visakhapatnam53Cuttack52Nagpur48Lucknow48Telangana46Karnataka42Rajkot40Jodhpur35Patna31Agra30Guwahati24Dehradun23Allahabad23SC15Ranchi8Panaji7Orissa6Calcutta5Jabalpur3Varanasi3Rajasthan3Kerala2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Gauhati1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 65(1)2

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

reassessment of such property taxes was made, and the amount of tax to be levied and collected was determined under sub-section (1). The proviso thereto required the Corporation to pay simple interest, at the rate of six percent per annum, on the amount of excess liable to be refunded under Sub-section (2), from the date of the decree

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

54), DVO-5, BENGALURU, FILED UNDER SECTION 39(1) OF KVAT ACT 1956 R/W RULE 37(2) FOR KVAT RULES 2005 FOR THE AY 2009-10. IN STRP NO. 16 OF 2022 BETWEEN : 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED THROUGH THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (ADMINISTRATIVE), DVO-06 KIADB BUILDING 14TH CROSS, PEENYA BENGALURU-560 058 STRP