BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 46(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,689Mumbai1,503Chennai513Bangalore464Jaipur318Ahmedabad286Kolkata259Hyderabad207Chandigarh169Raipur129Surat109Indore107Amritsar106Rajkot87Pune82Cuttack60Karnataka51Cochin51Telangana50Lucknow47Visakhapatnam45Patna43Guwahati40Nagpur37Ranchi35Jodhpur32Agra28Allahabad25Dehradun20SC15Orissa7Calcutta4Rajasthan3Varanasi3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Panaji2Jabalpur1Uttarakhand1Gauhati1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 65(1)2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

1)(a)(ii) of the KVAT Act. However, insofar as it relates to Telecommunication equipment, the same requires to be notified by the State Government in exercise of powers conferred under the KVAT Act and the State Government has been issuing Notifications specifying the products which would be treated as IT products;  Notification No. FD 43 CSL 07(02) dated

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

46 which it was understood in the Legislative practice of India; and the word “rate” was a kind of imposition on the annual letting of the property if actually let out, and on the notional letting if the property was not let out. The appeal preferred by the plaintiff-assessee was dismissed, and no relief was granted

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires