BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 46clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,691Mumbai1,503Chennai513Bangalore464Ahmedabad274Jaipur271Kolkata259Hyderabad208Chandigarh160Raipur129Surat109Amritsar103Indore89Rajkot87Pune82Cuttack60Karnataka51Telangana50Lucknow46Visakhapatnam45Patna43Guwahati40Nagpur37Cochin37Ranchi35Jodhpur32Agra28Allahabad25Dehradun20SC15Orissa7Calcutta4Rajasthan3Varanasi3Panaji2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Uttarakhand1Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 65(1)2

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

46 which it was understood in the Legislative practice of India; and the word “rate” was a kind of imposition on the annual letting of the property if actually let out, and on the notional letting if the property was not let out. The appeal preferred by the plaintiff-assessee was dismissed, and no relief was granted

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

Section 29 of the Act because in the case on hand as far as Nokia was concerned, the phone charger was sold as a separate accessory and, therefore, Apex Court held that it is not part of mobile phone. The battery was supplied with mobile phone and, therefore, battery charger was earlier classified as cell phone and it's part

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires