BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 45(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,787Mumbai1,527Bangalore620Chennai554Kolkata301Jaipur276Ahmedabad258Hyderabad229Chandigarh162Pune100Rajkot99Raipur90Indore86Amritsar85Karnataka78Surat69Patna59Telangana51Visakhapatnam44Lucknow44Guwahati40Cuttack37Allahabad37Nagpur37Jodhpur36Cochin34SC19Agra15Orissa9Dehradun7Ranchi4Rajasthan4Calcutta4Kerala3Panaji2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 65(1)2Addition to Income2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

2) TMI 1247 9 (2017) 77 Taxman.com 219 (All) STRP NO. 08 OF 2022 AND CONNECTED MATTERS 36 similar to the facts in Nokia India Case. In the Samsung India Case, the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad has interpreted the provisions contained in Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India which mainly relates to the transfer of goods

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ANKIT CHIRAG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated herein-above, leaving

ITA/8/2024HC Rajasthan13 Aug 2024

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,MADAN GOPAL VYAS

For Appellant: Mr. S. Rajeswara Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit
Section 115Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 69Section 69A

45,301/- was diligently declared. 17. The Assessing Officer has miserably failed to appreciate that the provisions of sub-section (4) of Section 139 of the IT Act, at the relevant time, provided an outer time-limit till 31-3-2017 to the assessee to file return of income for the assessment year 2016-17. Further, the said return

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

2) stipulates that the provisions of Articles 203 and 204 shall have effect in relation to the making of a grant under Article 206(1), and to any law to be made under the said clause as they have effect in relation to the making of a grant with regard to any expenditure mentioned in the annual financial statement

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

2 (2010) 5 SCC 747 3 (2004) 10 SCC 627 4 2009 (8) SCC 582 Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:05.10.2025 11:29:12 Signature Not Verified LA.APP. 59/2007 & connected Page 88 of 171 18.4 Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the market value for the acquired land of village, Kilokari cannot be treated differently from the adjacent