BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 43clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,002Mumbai1,372Chennai553Bangalore463Jaipur314Ahmedabad308Hyderabad242Kolkata238Chandigarh182Indore116Surat106Raipur101Pune92Amritsar91Rajkot86Cochin75Guwahati66Patna55Karnataka51Lucknow50Cuttack45Telangana44Nagpur41Jodhpur34Visakhapatnam32Dehradun29Ranchi28Agra26Allahabad24SC19Orissa7Calcutta5Kerala3Panaji3Rajasthan3Varanasi3Jabalpur2Uttarakhand1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 65(1)2

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

43 light of the interpretation placed on the statutory provisions, the Legislature need not pass a Validating Act. In the exercise of its plenary powers, under Articles 245, 246 and 248, the Legislature can make a new Act altering fundamentally the provisions which were the basis of the judgment passed by the Court, and this can be done with retrospective

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

43 local or wide area network) and parts thereof, but excluding attachments and transmission or reception apparatus of heading 8843,8525,8527 or 8528.” (Emphasis Supplied) 14. The Apex Court in Nokia India Case, further held that: “14. …'Cellular telephone' is in schedule B at Entry No. 60(6)(g) vide HSN Code No.8525.20.17. The Tariff No.8525.20.17 only relates

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires