BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 42clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,721Mumbai1,537Chennai549Bangalore447Jaipur368Ahmedabad351Kolkata317Hyderabad282Chandigarh180Pune162Indore128Surat127Raipur119Amritsar115Visakhapatnam96Rajkot86Nagpur74Cochin56Lucknow52Telangana51Karnataka50Guwahati48Cuttack43Jodhpur37Agra34Patna33Dehradun29Allahabad26SC16Orissa8Kerala6Calcutta5Jabalpur4Rajasthan3Ranchi3Panaji2Varanasi2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 65(1)2

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

42 (iv) WHAT IS A VALIDATING ACT, AND WHEN CAN SUCH AN ACT BE VALIDLY MADE? 71. In examining the question whether or not Act 5 of 2020 is a Validating Act, we must first examine what a ‘validating Act’ is, and when can such an Act be validly made? Black’s Law Dictionary (7th Edition Page No. 1421) defines

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

42 VAT Act does not mention accessories for the purpose of taxing the items/product at 4%. 11. Now, we shall analyse Entry 53 of Schedule III of the KVAT Act read with the Notification No. FD 43 CSL 07(02) dated April 4, 2007 issued by the State Government, which is for consideration in these present Revision Petitions before

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires