BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 39(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,592Mumbai1,388Bangalore566Chennai483Hyderabad260Jaipur259Ahmedabad259Kolkata210Chandigarh136Pune104Raipur102Amritsar83Indore76Rajkot65Surat61Nagpur56Lucknow46Patna42Agra38Allahabad37Guwahati36Visakhapatnam26Jodhpur25Cochin20SC18Cuttack15Karnataka14Telangana13Orissa8Kerala6Ranchi6Calcutta5Rajasthan4Dehradun4Panaji2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Jabalpur2Varanasi1Madhya Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 66(1)4Section 65(1)2Section 39(1)2Addition to Income2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

39 and requires the application of the dominant intention test, which is a proposition that was neither urged nor considered in Nokia India Case;  as per Section 4 of the KVAT Act, charge is on the taxable turnover of a dealer. Under Rule 3 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules 200512, there is no mechanism by which the Revenue

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENRAL vs. SHRI NIRMAL KUMAR KEDIA

In the result, the impugned orders of the

ITA/4/2020HC Rajasthan
30 Sept 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Section 39(1)Section 66(1)

REASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23.02.2015 WAS PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT AND RECOVERY) 1.3 DVO 1 BANGALORE UNDER SECTION 39

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

39 therefore, be said that the impugned enactment is intended to over-reach the judgment of the High Court. 64. Learned Additional Advocate General would further state that the State Legislature is entitled to make laws on all topics within its legislative field; the judiciary may declare whether a law is valid or invalid; while the Legislature is entitled

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires