PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED
ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025
Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)
39
and requires the application of the dominant intention
test, which is a proposition that was neither urged nor
considered in Nokia India Case;
as per Section 4 of the KVAT Act, charge is on the
taxable turnover of a dealer. Under Rule 3 of the
Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules 200512, there is no
mechanism by which the Revenue